For more than 20 years, a substantial part of Alan's practice has involved constitutional and other public law litigation, professional liability litigation, defamation litigation, employment litigation, business contract litigation, insurance coverage opinions, and litigation (governmental, professional, and business liability policies).
Alan practices in the federal and state courts of Pennsylvania and Ohio. Before joining Marshall Dennehey in 2003, he was a litigation attorney in Cleveland, Ohio (1979-1981, 1983-2003), where, in addition to trial court litigation, he handled more than 25 appeals in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the Ohio Supreme Court and the Ohio Courts of Appeals. He was an editor at The Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company in Rochester, New York, from 1981 to 1983, where he made substantial contributions to the publication Federal Procedure, Lawyers Edition.
Significant Representative Matters
· Defended many EEOC and Ohio Civil Rights Commission administrative complaints. Recently defended a fast food franchise against an Ohio Civil Rights Commission administrative complaint and settled the matter for $500.
· Currently defending a business entity against a defamation claim brought by its former president who was discharged for violation of his noncompete agreement.
· Won summary judgment against a claim brought by a police officer under the Pennsylvania Police Tenure Act.
· Prevailed on summary judgment in a federal case brought by a county nursing home administrator who alleged a violation of his constitutional rights.
· Won defense verdict in a defamation suit by a general contractor against a construction manager for a Pennsylvania school district.
· Won defense verdict in a federal Fair Housing Act case against Ohio municipalities (affirmed on appeal).
· As a result of Alan's qualified immunity appeal from a denial of a municipal officials' motion to dismiss, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals formulated a new, pro-defendant procedure for municipal officials' qualified immunity motions to dismiss.
· The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted Alan's Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis of statute of limitations in a case in which a female middle school student had disappeared for ten years, secretly moving in with a school security guard employed by the client security company.
· Obtained summary judgment in favor of the president of a condominium association who was sued for defamation, invasion of privacy, and ethnic intimidation by a condominium unit owner.
· Obtained dismissals of two related cases alleging federal constitutional claims against a nonprofit telecommunications emergency dispatch company (and certain dispatchers) used by Pennsylvania political subdivisions where a discharged employee shot and killed the plaintiffs' decedents. The first case was dismissed on statute of limitations. After extensive discovery and briefing, summary judgment was granted on the merits to the defendants in the second case (affirmed on appeal).
· Obtained summary judgment in a case in which the plaintiffs alleged that defendant attorneys committed legal malpractice in connection with a manufacturing company's credit transactions with a bank.
· Obtained summary judgment on the basis of res judicata in a federal lawsuit alleging that a Pennsylvania municipality and its council members violated a construction contractor's constitutional rights when the council decertified the contractor (affirmed on appeal).
· The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granted Alan's motion to dismiss a First Amendment case brought by an adult cabaret dancer against an Ohio municipality.
· Obtained the dismissal of a federal court substantive due process case against an Ohio municipality for failing to approve a concrete recycling plant, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal.
· Motion to Dismiss was granted in a federal case against an Ohio municipality and its officials where the plaintiffs alleged violations of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and RICO.
· After obtaining dismissals of repetitive lawsuits filed by a pro se plaintiff against an Ohio municipality, obtained a frivolous conduct judgment against the plaintiff under an Ohio statute ($10,000.00 judgment against the pro se plaintiff affirmed on appeal).
· Obtained summary judgment in a case by a municipal firefighter alleging constitutional claims against an Ohio municipality and its mayor arising out of employment issues (affirmed on appeal).
· Obtained summary judgment in favor of an Ohio township on the plaintiffs' takings claim (affirmed on appeal).
· Summary judgment was granted in favor of an Ohio mayor, city council members and a public service director on the basis of Alan's argument that an ordinance passed by initiative (which abrogated earlier city council legislation for the construction of a reservoir) violated the Contracts Clause of the United States Constitution (affirmed on appeal).
Published Works
· "Ohio Employment Law," Law Alerts on the Marshall Dennehey website, 2006 -2009
· "Third Circuit Applies Twombly Notice Pleading Principles to Fourteenth Amendment Claims Brought Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983," Defense Digest, Vol. 14, No. 4, Dec., 2008
· "Squaring the Circle: The Third Circuit Mandates Pre-Answer Procedures for Qualified Immunity Challenges to Factually Vague Complaints," Defense Digest, Vol. 12, No. 4, Dec., 2006
· "Land Use Earthquake: Supreme Court Modifies "Takings" Jurisprudence," Defense Digest, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Sept.), 2005
· "Recent Developments Regarding Ohio's Vexatious Litigator Statute," Defense Digest, Vol. 9, No. 2 (June), 2003
· "'Municipal Corporations,' 'Property Rights,' and 'Due Process, Procedural'," Encyclopedia of U.S. Supreme Court, edited by Thomas L. Lewis and Richard L. Wilson, (Pasadena: Salem Press, 2000)
· "Federal Procedure," Lawyers Edition, (Rochester, N.Y.: Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company), Contributing Author, 1981-1983
Representative Cases
· Phillips v. County of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224 (3d Cir. 2008)
· Thomas v. Independence Township, 463 F.3d 285 (3d Cir. 2006)
· Fair Housing Advocates Association v. City of Richmond Hts., 209 F.3d 626 (6th Cir. 2000)
· Wayne v. Village of Sebring, 36 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 1994)
· Zilich v. Longo, 34 F.3d 359 (6th Cir. 1994)
· Whittaker v. County of Lawrence, 674 F. Supp.2d 688 (W.D. Pa. 2009)
· Doughty v. City of Vermillion, 18 F. Supp.2d 819 (N.D. Ohio 1999), aff'd (6th Cir. 2000)
· ACLU of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Stow, 29 F. Supp.2d 845 (N.D. Ohio 1998)
· McGee v. City of Warrensville Hts., 16 F. Supp.2d 837 (N.D. Ohio 1998)
· Threesome Entertainment v. Strittmather, 4 F. Supp.2d 710 (N.D. Ohio 1998)
· Rose v. Village of Peninsula, 875 F. Supp.442 (N.D. Ohio 1995)
· Smith v. City of Elyria, 857 F. Supp. 1203 (N.D. Ohio 1994)
· Bettio v. Village of Northfield, 775 F. Supp. 1545 (N.D. Ohio 1991)
· Sheffield v. Rowland, 87 Ohio St.3d 9, 716 N.E.2d 1121 (1999)
· City of Middleburg Hts. v. Ohio Bd. of Bldg. Standards, 65 Ohio St.3d 510, 605 N.E.2d (amicus brief) (1992)
· Wagner v. Armbruster, 108 Ohio App.3d 719, 671 N.E.2d 630 (1996)
· Ketchel v. Bainbridge Township, 79 Ohio App.3d 174, 607 N.E.2d 22 (1992)
· Peppers v. Beier, 75 Ohio App.3d 420, 599 N.E.2d 793 (1991)
Associations & Memberships
· Allegheny County (Pennsylvania) Bar Association
· Federal Bar Association
· Ohio State Bar Association
· Pennsylvania Bar Association
Honors & Awards
· AV® Preeminent™ by LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell
Year Joined Organization: 2003
Publications
Employee can prevail on a detrimental reliance theory where the employer made a clear and unambiguous promise and the employer made no applicable disclaimers.
Law Alerts · April 1, 2010
Most Ohio promissory estoppel and fraud claims brought by employees against employers have foundered on the element of detrimental reliance ever since the Ohio Supreme Court established strict guidelines for establishing detrimental reliance in Wing..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2010
Prevailing wage law penalties are mandatory in an employee-initiated enforcement action.
Law Alerts · April 1, 2010
Chapter 4115 of the Ohio Revised Code requires contractors and others to pay prevailing wages on construction projects involving public improvements. Section 4115.13(C) provides that employees who were paid less than the prevailing wage in such..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2010
Ohio statutory procedures supersede township regulations in the termination of a township police officer.
Law Alerts · April 1, 2010
A township police officer was terminated after the officer refused to submit to a psychological examination prompted by citizen complaints. Under the police department's general orders, the chief of police signed a charging form and submitted it to..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2010
State employee's suits for violation of collective bargaining agreements must be brought in a Court of Common Pleas and not in the Court of Claims.
Law Alerts · April 1, 2010
A juvenile corrections specialist in the Ohio Department of Youth Services filed suit in the Ohio Court of Claims following a collective bargaining arbitration that resulted in a finding that her termination was with just cause. The employee's..., Case Law Alert - 2nd Qtr 2010
First Appellate District disagrees with Eighth Appellate District regarding applicability of Ohio revised code 2744.09(b) to retaliation claims against governmental supervisors.
Law Alerts · January 1, 2010
An employee filed an action against a fire district and its chief, alleging that a 20-day suspension for allegedly lying on medical questionnaires constituted retaliation against her for her filing of an age- and gender-discrimination lawsuit and a..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
Appropriate disclaimers in employment documents, acknowledged by employee, negate any inference of an employment contract inconsistent with employment at will.
Law Alerts · January 1, 2010
An employee's 90-day probationary period was extended by 30 days as a result of instances requiring reprimands. As a result of additional complaints about the employee's performance, the employer terminated him at the end of the extended..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
An employee needing new and unforeseeable FMLA leave must notify the employer as soon as practicable.
Law Alerts · January 1, 2010
An employer granted an employee suffering from reactive depression limited FMLA leave for treatment and for the period for recovery from treatment. As a result of a blackout, allegedly caused by his depression, the employee did not timely notify his..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010
An employee fired in retaliation for filing a workers' compensation claim is barred from pursuing a public policy wrongful discharge claim.
Law Alerts · January 1, 2010
The syllabus of the Ohio Supreme Court decision in Bickers v. W. & S. Life Insurance Co., 116 Ohio St.3d 351, 2007 Ohio 6751, 879 N.E.2d 201 (2007), stated, in pertinent part, that "[a]n employee who is terminated from employment while..., Case Law Alert - 1st Qtr 2010