- ITC Litigation
- Patent Interferences
|Contact Info||Telephone: (703) 412-6225|
|University ||University of California, Berkeley, B.A., Computer Science/Math|
|Law School||University of Washington School of Law, J.D.|
|Admitted||2008, Virginia; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; Supreme Court of Virginia; Registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office|
•American Bar Association
•American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA)
Alexander (Alex) B. Englehart is a patent litigation attorney practicing in the firm's Litigation, ITC Litigation and Patent Interferences groups. He litigates matters in federal courts and before the International Trade Commission (ITC). His practice also includes interference matters before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Mr. Englehart's patent litigation experience spans a variety of technical areas, including wireless networking, global positioning systems (GPS), micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), and metallurgy. Additionally, he has served as local counsel in patent cases in the Eastern District of Virginia, providing clients with a detailed understanding of local rules and procedures.
While in law school Mr. Englehart twice served as a full-time judicial extern in the federal judiciary - first for Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and then for Judge Randall Rader of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Federal Circuit Decides To Retain De Novo Review Of Claim Construction
Monday, March 24, 2014
On February 21, 2014, the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for
Valeo Tells ITC Rival Ripped Off Windshield Wiper Patents
Monday, October 20, 2014
Chico Gholz and Alex Englehart co-authored, Let's Hope High Court TTAB Case Doesn't Hurt PTAB Rulings
Thursday, June 5, 2014
Will B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries Affect Coakwell v. United States?
Friday, May 16, 2014
Is The Estoppel Of The New AIA Proceedings Worse Than Interference Estoppel?
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
How Close Is Close Enough?
Friday, October 1, 2010
|Reported Cases||Representative Matters: Representing Valeo in a Section 337 proceeding and multiple district court patent infringement actions regarding windshield wiper blade technology. In the Matter of Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof (ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-928); Federal-Mogul Corp. et al. v. Valeo, Inc. et al. (E.D. Mich. Case No. 2:13-cv-11627); Valeo, Inc. et al. v. Federal-Mogul Corp. et al. (E.D. Mich. Case No. 2:13-cv-14393) (Current Firm Client); Representing L'Oreal in multiple district court patent infringement actions regarding sunscreen technology. L'Oreal S.A. et al. v. MSD Consumer Care, Inc. (D. Del. Case No. 1:12-cv-00099); L'Oreal S.A. et al. v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. et al. (D. Del. Case No. 1:12-cv-00098) (Current Firm Client); Represented SkyHawke Technologies, LLC in a case involving GPS-based rangefinders for use on a golf course. GPSI et al. v. Altex et al. (N.D. Tex.).; Representing Motorola in an interference with Research in Motion (RIM) over wireless e-mail technology. Lazaridis v. Eggleston.; Representing a domestic sporting goods technology company in multiple patent infringement actions in various district courts concerning GPS-based golf rangefinders.; Represented a domestic telecommunications company in an interference relating to wireless e-mail technology.; Served as a member of the ITC trial team and provided assistance on the briefs in a Section 337 action involving MEMS microphone technology.; Served as local counsel in multiple actions in the Eastern District of Virginia.; Served as a member of the ITC trial team and provided assistance on the briefs in a case involving MEMS microphone technology. Certain Silicon Microphone Packages and Products Containing the Same.; Served as local counsel for the Regents of the University of Minnesota in a suit against the USPTO in the Eastern District of Virginia. Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Kappos.; Served as local counsel for Stork Townsend in a patent infringement case in the Eastern District of Virginia. F.R. Drake v. Stork Townsend.|
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Samsung Files New 337 Complaint Regarding Certain Graphics Processing Chips
Alexander B. Englehart,Eric W. Schweibenz, November 27, 2014
On November 21, 2014, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC of Austin, Texas (collectively, "Samsung") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. Due to the size of the complaint we have split...
|Profile Visibility |
|#4 in weekly profile views out of 3,688 lawyers in Alexandria, Virginia|
|#993 in weekly profile views out of 1,649,257 total lawyers Overall|