- State and Local Tax
- Tax Controversy & Litigation
|Contact Info||Telephone: 212.389.5042|
|University ||Florida State University, B.S., magna cum laude; University of Massachusetts Amherst, M.B.A.|
|Law School||Wake Forest University School of Law, J.D., cum laude Business Editor, Wake Forest Law Review; Georgetown University Law Center, LL.M., Taxation, with distinction|
|Admitted||2010, New York; Georgia|
|Born||Springfield, Massachusetts, 1982|
Andrew Appleby represents clients in all stages of tax controversy-from audit through appellate litigation-and advises clients regarding multistate tax planning and complex transactions. With a practice focused on state and local tax, he has experience in many areas of multistate taxation, including income, franchise, sales and use taxes.
Andrew combines his dedication to tax law with his passion for sports, regularly publishing law review articles in the area of sports taxation. Emerging as one of the nation's prolific scholars in this arena, he has been featured on the subject in The New York Times and Bloomberg TV's "InBusiness with Margaret Brennan." Additionally, Andrew has experience and industry insight regarding cloud computing, remote access software and electronic services.
Andrew participated in the Graduate Tax Scholar fellowship program at Georgetown University Law Center. Prior to earning an LL.M. at Georgetown, Andrew was an associate with an Atlanta-based firm, where he focused on transactions in the information technology and energy industries.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Cha-Ching! Minnesota Supreme Court Holds Semi-Custom Software Subject to Sales Tax
Andrew D. Appleby,Derek Takehara, October 3, 2014
The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the Minnesota Department of Revenue’s imposition of sales tax on a software company’s sale of partially customized software because the taxpayer failed to separately state customization charges on customer invoices. The taxpayer licensed software that...
Cleaning House: Virginia Denies Manufacturing Exemption for Cleaning Products
Andrew D. Appleby,Kathryn E. Pittman, September 4, 2014
The Virginia Tax Commissioner determined that an ink manufacturer’s purchase of cleaning chemicals did not qualify for the industrial manufacturing exemption from sales and use tax. To avoid color contamination, the taxpayer had to regularly clean the equipment used to produce the ink with...
|Profile Visibility |
|#9,696 in weekly profile views out of 89,656 lawyers in New York, New York|
|#129,265 in weekly profile views out of 1,568,853 total lawyers Overall|