- Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Property Litigation
- Non-Practicing Entity (NPE) Defense
- Energy & Clean Technology
- IP Licensing & Transfers
- ITC Section 337 Litigation
- Media & Telecommunications Transactions
- Software & Electronics
- Trade Secrets
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Digital Economy
|Contact Info||Telephone: 404.853.8493|
|University ||Georgetown University, B.A.|
|Law School||University of Virginia School of Law, J.D.|
Patent Strategy & Management, Board of Editors
Southern Center for Human Rights, Board of Directors
American Bar Association, Litigation Section, Woman Advocate Committee
State Bar of Georgia, Intellectual Property Section, Litigation Committee
State Bar of Georgia, Post-Conviction Representation Committee
Atlanta Intellectual Property Inn of Court, Master of the Bench
American Intellectual Property Law Association, Women in IP Committee
International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association
Women in Technology, Board of Directors
TurningPoint Women's Healthcare, Board of Directors and Executive Committee
Hagar's House, Decatur Cooperative Ministries, Volunteer
|Born||East Orange, New Jersey, June 11, 1963|
A seasoned litigator with a background in complex civil matters, Ann Fort oversees and protects the intellectual property rights of clients in the United States and abroad. Her practice encompasses patent infringement, licensing disputes, trade secret protection and unfair competition. She tries cases in both federal and state courts and represents clients in alternative dispute resolution, such as arbitration and mediation. Her recent experiences include defending claims brought by non-practicing entities, also known as patent holding companies or patent assertion entities.
Many of Ann's clients are in the technology industry. Her technology cases range from loan and deposit pricing software, Internet-based information management systems and ground fault circuit interrupters, to power management unit chips, interactive television program guides, computer network security protection systems and medical information systems. She also counsels businesses in complex multiparty litigation. In the pharmaceutical industry, for example, Ann represents both patent owners in licensing disputes and accused infringers of formulation patents, including in Hatch-Waxman litigation. Ann's clients vary from large corporations and start-up businesses to universities and research institutes.
An active leader in Sutherland's pro bono program, Ann achieved clemency for a client on death row, representing him for more than 11 years before he was granted clemency just hours before his scheduled execution. She serves on American Bar Association and Georgia Bar committees charged with considering capital defense representation and related policy issues.
Sutherland successfully defends IT firm against a non-practicing entity.
Sutherland prevails in three-front patent litigation for international electronics manufacturer.
Sutherland successfully settles trade secret matter for Z-Line Designs, Inc.
Awards and Rankings
Named to The Best Lawyers in America in the area of litigation - intellectual property (2013-2016)
Intellectual Property Community Service Award (2010)
Named among the “Legal Elite” by Georgia Trend magazine (2006, 2007)
Recipient of Sutherland's first annual Charles T. Lester Pro Bono Award (2009)
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
De Novo Review of Claim Construction No Longer the De Facto Standard
Ann G. Fort,Robert R.L. Kohse,William L. Warren,David E. Wigley, February 13, 2015
On January 20, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, rejected the de novo review standard applied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit when reviewing all claim construction issues. The Supreme Court held that, when reviewing a District Court’s...
U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rules That Juries Should Decide Trademark Tacking
Ann G. Fort,James H. Johnson,Peter G. Pappas,Jeremy D. Spier,Daniel J. Warren, February 13, 2015
In its first substantive trademark ruling in more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held on January 21, in Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank et al., No. 13-1211, that tacking ¿ which is whether two trademarks are sufficiently similar to allow the newer mark to use the priority...
|Profile Visibility |
|#1,443 in weekly profile views out of 20,292 lawyers in Atlanta, Georgia|
|#100,525 in weekly profile views out of 1,726,728 total lawyers Overall|