Anthony B. Corleto: Lawyer with Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Anthony B. Corleto

Phone203.388.2404

Peer Rating
 4.7/5.0
AV® Preeminent

Client Rating

Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon
Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials Ratings & ReviewsOther Offices
 

Practice Areas

  • Accountants
  • Commercial & Business Litigation
  • Commercial Contracts & Agreements
  • Corporate Governance & Compliance
  • General Liability & Casualty
  • Insurance & Reinsurance Coverage
  • Construction
  • Intellectual Property
  • Land Use & Zoning
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Municipal/Local Government
  • Real Estate & Development
  • Real Property
 
Contact InfoTelephone: 203.388.2404
Fax: 203.388.9101
http://www.wilsonelser.com/attorneys/anthony_b_corleto
 
University College of Insurance, B.B.A., 1983
 
Law SchoolPace University School of Law, J.D., 1989
 
AdmittedConnecticut; U.S. Court of Appeals; U.S. District Court; U.S. District Court
 
Biography

Tony Corleto focuses on commercial litigation, transactions and municipal liability. His experience covers intellectual property, corporate, construction, insurance coverage and bad faith, environmental, and employment practice liability issues. He regularly tries cases and argues appeals in the state and federal courts of Connecticut and New York, including complex matters involving banking and lease finance, software disputes, development rights and insurance coverage.

Before his legal career, Tony worked as a commercial casualty underwriter and risk management consultant. He also has served as general counsel for a software company where he handled copyright, trademark, trade secret and licensing matters.

Whether Tony is managing a data breach for a gaming company or litigating construction defect issues, he looks beyond the issue of immediate concern to better understand how it originated. This allows him to help clients avoid similar problems in the future.

Awards & Distinctions

AV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell

Publications

Connecticut Appellate Court Rules Reinstatement of Coverage After Lapse for Nonpayment Is Prospective Only
June 12, 2014

Business Interests Outside Law Practice May Preclude Duty to Defend
ABA Section of Litigation: Professional Liability Newsletter February 4, 2013

Events

Preparing a Defense for Sports Medicine Practitioners
May 10, 2013

News

Tony Corleto Named General Counsel for National Sports Concussion Coalition
February 2014

Corleto and Antoci Prevail in Defamation Case
April 16, 2013 (Also at White Plains, New York Office)

 
Reported CasesRepresentative Matters; Commercial; Won summary judgment dismissal of tortious interference, unfair trade practice and breach of contract claims in federal court in the District of Connecticut on behalf of an insurance company client. Plaintiff, an independent adjuster, commenced this action to recover payment of unpaid invoices and for breach of an alleged agreement to use the adjuster's services exclusively in Connecticut and Western Massachusetts. Defendant withheld payment and ended the relationship when an internal audit revealed a pattern of fraudulent billing by plaintiff, and brought a counterclaim for affirmative relief. Court dismissed plaintiff's breach of contract claims; defendant's counterclaims and plaintiff's claim for unpaid invoices also were resolved favorably for the client.Resolved a commercial dispute between a landlord client and a tenant that was chronically delinquent in paying rent and was preparing to vacate the premises prior to the expiration of the lease. In a rare move, the court granted the Writ of Attachment in an amount $240,000, which covered both back rent and the remaining balance of the lease.Obtained a defense verdict in a trespass/property damage claim brought in Connecticut Superior Court by the owner of a Greenwich, CT, estate home against the owner and builder of the adjacent property. Plaintiff claimed that the construction company, while doing work on the adjacent property owned by the co-defendant, trespassed on her property, damaging a vintage rock wall and disrupting the grade. Successfully argued that plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proof.Represent a national nonprofit youth football organization as a defendant in a variety of matters arising from league operations across the country, including defeating injunctions brought by three disqualified teams seeking to gain post-season berths in regional championships.Municipal; Obtained dismissal of a Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) case in the Eastern District of New York against an environmental engineering consulting firm. Plaintiff, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, NY, acquired a 97-acre parcel of land in the Village of Old Westbury to develop a cemetery. After the Village denied a permit because cemeteries were not within the building code, the diocese sued, claiming the cemetery would be used for religious purposes and therefore would be allowed under RLUIPA. The diocese prevailed on appeal, with the stipulation that the project be subject to State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process. Our client, the environmental consulting firm, was hired by the Village to establish ground water monitoring and management criteria under which a cemetery could be developed, if feasible. The firm recommended stringent criteria to avoid contamination of the main source of water on Long Island. The diocese claimed the firm violated RLUIPA and the first and 14th amendments of the U.S. Constitution because its criteria for the cemetery were more stringent than regional criteria for similar non-religious uses ( e.g., golf courses). We successfully argued that plaintiff failed to articulate facts demonstrating religious animus or an interference with the exercise of religious beliefs.Won defense verdict for a Connecticut municipal Board of Education and its officials in a student bullying case. Complainant initially leveled claims of common law negligence and violations of the Connecticut bullying statute. Court granted defendants' initial motion to strike the bullying claim on the grounds that the statute did not create a private cause of action. Motions for summary judgment based on governmental and qualified immunity were denied for questions of fact.
 
ISLN900652620
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Connecticut Appellate Court Rules Reinstatement of Coverage After Lapse for Nonpayment Is Prospective Only
Anthony B. Corleto, June 18, 2014
When a homeowner’s insurer reinstates coverage that was cancelled for nonpayment of premium, can it avoid coverage for a fire loss that happened while the policy was cancelled? Yes, said the Connecticut Appellate Court in the recent decision Brown v. State Farm Insurance Co., 150 Conn. App....


View Ratings & Reviews
Profile Visibility
#238 in weekly profile views out of 2,358 lawyers in Stamford, Connecticut
#118,525 in weekly profile views out of 1,512,663 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Anthony B. Corleto

1010 Washington Boulevard
StamfordCT 06901




Loading...
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now