Customer Support: 800-526-4902
 

Legal Articles: Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 16


View Page: 1  2  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLNew Disclosure about Employment Terms
Carol A. Gefis; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
March 26, 2012, previously published on March 14, 2012
As of January 1, 2012, Employers are obligated to provide a written disclosure to new employees regarding basic employment information.

 

HTMLRoad Show
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
March 23, 2012, previously published on March 20, 2012
In my recent blog entry, 998 Update: Avoiding the Wreckage, I mentioned that the CCP 998 decisions keep on coming. Little did I know that even more were on the way. Each new decision covers a wrinkle that could affect the outcome of a case in dramatic ways. And so as lawyers, we have to...

 

HTML998 Update: Avoiding the Wreckage
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
March 8, 2012, previously published on March 5, 2012
Evaluating Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offers brings to mind the partner that every associate meets - the one that ends the assignment with, “It shouldn’t take long - it’s a no-brainer.” Of course, that assignment is always anything but a “no-brainer.”...

 

HTMLThe Carrot and Stick
David Marchiano; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
February 15, 2012, previously published on February 13, 2012
Code of Civil Procedure section 998 jurisprudence is a hot topic these days. Last month, the Fourth Appellate District directly addressed the issue of whether a defendant can recover the fees expended on a plaintiff’s expert when the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable award under...

 

HTMLUp In Smoke
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
January 6, 2012, previously published on January 4, 2012
A recent decision by the Third Appellate District is a reminder of the opportunity and the limits of a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The case is Collins v. eMachines, Inc.

 

HTMLHands Off!
David Marchiano; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
December 21, 2011, previously published on December 15, 2011
Every now and again a case comes along with a result that directly impacts the everyday lives of millions of people. One would not expect such a case to originate in traffic court, however.

 

HTMLGoin Round in Circles
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
November 10, 2011, previously published on November 3, 2011
A recurring theme is that collectively speaking, lawyers often make and evaluate Code of Civil Procedure section 998 offers without a complete understanding of how the statute operates. That knowledge gap is a little scary.

 

HTMLGet It In Writing
Ioana R. Mondescu; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
August 18, 2011, previously published on August 12, 2011
A recent ruling by the Fourth District Court of Appeal confirms that unless an order of dismissal is in writing, signed by the trial judge, and filed, it is ineffective as a judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 581d. In Powell v. County of Orange (Aug. 8, 2011) 2011 Cal.App. LEXIS 1024,...

 

HTMLBe Brief
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
August 2, 2011, previously published on July 27, 2011
In what appears to be a trend (see prior post, In Search Of), another decision issued last week demonstrates a different kind of missing ingredient in legal briefs -- the argument:

 

HTMLIn Search Of
Gary A. Watt; Archer Norris A Professional Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article
July 26, 2011, previously published on July 19, 2011
Here's a reminder about the appellate lawyer's obligation to tie legal arguments to the record. In addition, every now and then you run across what appears to be a little judicial jab in an appellate opinion:

 


View Page: 1  2  Next