Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP

 – Firm Profile
 




Bernstein Litowitz <br />Berger & Grossmann LLP Law Firm Logo

Bernstein Litowitz
Berger & Grossmann LLP
 

Size of Organization: 55
Main Office: New York, New York
Web Site: http://www.blbglaw.com

Telephone: 212-554-1400
Telecopier: 212-554-1444



Profile Visibility
#1,070 in weekly profile views out of 281,522 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Antitrust LawCivil Rights
Civil Trial PracticeClass Actions
Commercial LawCommercial Litigation
Corporate LawSecurities Law
 
               Learn More

 

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP prosecutes class and private actions nationwide on behalf of individual and institutional clients. The firm's litigation practice is principally in the areas of securities class actions in federal and state courts, private commercial litigation, corporate governance litigation including claims for breach of fiduciary duty and proxy violations, as well as in prosecuting complex consumer claims, violations of federal anti-discrimination law and toxic tort litigation. In those cases where we have served as either lead counsel or as a member of plaintiffs' executive committee, the firm has recovered sums exceeding twenty billion dollars, often successfully advancing novel and socially beneficial principles. In this connection, we have developed important new law in the areas in which we litigate. We also handle, on behalf of major institutional clients and lenders, more general complex commercial litigation involving allegations of breach of contract, accountants' liability, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and negligence.

Our firm is dedicated to litigating with the highest level of professional competence, striving to secure the maximum possible recovery for our clients in the most efficient and professionally responsible manner. The firm structure allows us a far greater degree of independence, flexibility and satisfaction than a large firm environment, without sacrificing the quality of representation necessary to litigate complex actions successfully throughout the country.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Bernstein Litowitz
Berger & Grossmann LLP:
Securities (60 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Bernstein Litowitz
Berger & Grossmann LLP: 5


Documents by Bernstein Litowitz
Berger & Grossmann LLP on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Second Circuit Rules that Practice Increasingly Employed by District Courts to Deprive Plaintiffs Any Chance to Amend Following a Motion to Dismiss Ruling is an Abuse of Discretion
Michael D. Blatchley,Lauren McMillen Ormsbee, August 11, 2015
In Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Limited v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently rejected an increasingly common practice among district courts to dismiss complaints “with prejudice” if a plaintiff declines the opportunity to...

A Matter of Opinion? The Omnicare Decision Will Make it Harder for IPO Issuers to Mask Misrepresentations as Opinion Statements
Dave Kaplan, July 1, 2015
The US Supreme Court delivered a victory for investors last month with a decision that clarifies what companies can say in their IPOs and other securities offerings. In short, the Court’s long-awaited decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund,...

Dispatches from the Battleground: Will Fee-Shifting Bylaws Keep Shareholders from the Courthouse?
Edward G. Timlin, July 1, 2015
As discussed in the last edition of The Advocate, the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 8, 2014 ruling in ATP Tour, Inc. v. Deutscher Tennis Bund, 91 A.3d 554 (Del. 2014) presents a serious threat to meritorious stockholder litigation. ATP held that a non-stock corporation could adopt a bylaw...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.