About this office:
Bingham represents clients in cross-border restructurings and insolvencies; complex securities and financial regulatory matters; high-stakes litigation; environmental issues; government affairs; and sophisticated corporate, financing and technology transactions.
We have built our firm, on a global basis, in the areas where we are strongest and are able to counsel our clients most effectively. Our 1,000 lawyers are based in the world's major financial centers — New York, London, Tokyo and Hong Kong — as well as on both coasts in the United States.
Statement of Practice Summary:
Antitrust and Trade Regulation; Appellate; Banking; Base Reuse; Bioscience; Broker-Dealer Litigation; Business Regulation and White Collar Defense; Commercial Technology; Construction and Project Finance Litigation; Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions Group; Emerging Growth Companies; Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation; Energy and Resources; Environmental; Environmental and Land Use Litigation; Estate Planning; Financial Institutions Regulatory and Corporate; Financial Restructuring; General Corporate and Securities; Insolvency and Financial Services Litigation; Institutional Finance; Intellectual Property; Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation; International Trade Law; Investment Management; Japanese Practice; Labor and Employment; Land Use; Privacy and Security; Private Equity; Product Liability; Project and Structured Finance; Project Development; Real Estate; Real Estate Litigation; Securities and Corporate Governance Litigation; Sports, Entertainment and Media; Tax.
Documents by Lawyers at this office | |
Brinker Decided at Last: California Employers Not Required To Be “Lunch Police”Eileen O'Brien Cahill,Debra L. Fischer,Shannon S. Raj,James Severson, April 16, 2012
Eight years of litigation have finally resulted in a definitive ruling from the California Supreme Court that California employers need only provide employees with duty-free meal periods and rest breaks. They are not required to police them by ensuring that employees take their meal periods and...
Delaware Chancery Court Refuses to Enjoin Mergers Despite Issues with ProcessStephen D. Alexander,Sara Rezvanpour,David K. Robbins, March 22, 2012
In two recent cases, the Delaware Court of Chancery denied plaintiffs' requests to enjoin shareholder votes on proposed mergers that the court found likely to have been tainted by breaches of fiduciary duties. Noting the absence of any competing suitors and the availability of monetary damages, the...
Year Established: 1891