Bingham McCutchen LLP
Size of Organization: 1001
Year Established: 1891Web Site: http://www.bingham.com
|Profile Visibility |
#43 in weekly profile views out of 279,504 total law firms Overall
Bingham represents clients in cross-border restructurings and insolvencies; complex securities and financial regulatory matters; high-stakes litigation; environmental issues; government affairs; and sophisticated corporate, financing and technology transactions.
We have built our firm, on a global basis, in the areas where we are strongest and are able to counsel our clients most effectively. Our 1,000 lawyers are based in the world's major financial centers — New York, London, Tokyo and Hong Kong — as well as on both coasts in the United States.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Bingham McCutchen LLP:
Intellectual Property (55 cases in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Total number of U.S. granted patents by Bingham McCutchen LLP:
39 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Bingham McCutchen LLP:
Total number of Client Reviews for Bingham McCutchen LLP:
Documents by Bingham McCutchen LLP on Martindale.com
D.C. Circuit Decision in Ralls Corp. v. CFIUS May Provide a Peek Behind the Government’s CFIUS Curtain
Raechel Keay Anglin,Rebecca S. Hartley,Carl A. Valenstein, July 25, 2014
If the recent D.C. Circuit decision in Ralls Corp. v. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, et al., No. 13-5315 (D.C. Cir. July 15, 2014) stands, it may change the review process, if not the outcome, of reaching a Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States...
FedEx Indictment: Government Seeks to Outsource Criminal Enforcement
Brianna L. Abrams,Nicholas M. Gess,Nathan J. Hochman, July 25, 2014
On July 17, 2014, a federal grand jury in San Francisco returned a 15-count indictment charging FedEx with crimes for allegedly failing to heed warning signs that illegal Internet pharmacies were using FedEx facilities to ship drugs to consumers. United States v. FedEx Corporation, et al.,...