Home > Bingham McCutchen > Overview


Bingham McCutchen LLP

 – Firm Profile
 




Bingham McCutchen LLP Law Firm Logo

Bingham McCutchen LLP 

Size of Organization: 1001
Year Established: 1891
Web Site: http://www.bingham.com

Telephone: 617-951-8000
Telecopy: 617-951-8736



Profile Visibility
#49 in weekly profile views out of 279,714 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


General Practice
 
               Learn More

 

Bingham represents clients in cross-border restructurings and insolvencies; complex securities and financial regulatory matters; high-stakes litigation; environmental issues; government affairs; and sophisticated corporate, financing and technology transactions.

We have built our firm, on a global basis, in the areas where we are strongest and are able to counsel our clients most effectively. Our 1,000 lawyers are based in the world's major financial centers — New York, London, Tokyo and Hong Kong — as well as on both coasts in the United States.



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Source: U.S. Federal Civil District Court Databases. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Highest number of cases by Bingham McCutchen LLP:
Intellectual Property (55 cases in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Source: U.S. Patent Trade Office. Powered by LexisNexis atVantage

Total number of U.S. granted patents by Bingham McCutchen LLP:
39 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Bingham McCutchen LLP: 142
Client Review

Total number of Client Reviews for Bingham McCutchen LLP: 4


Documents by Bingham McCutchen LLP on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Ninth Circuit Questions De Minimis CERCLA Settlement and Deference to State
Jeremy Esterkin,Denise G. Fellers,Mae Kieng Hau,Rick R. Rothman, August 22, 2014
The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Arizona v. Tucson rebuked a district court’s rubber-stamp approval of several consent decrees under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The district court failed to adequately scrutinize the decrees...

Second Circuit Defines ‘Customer’ Under FINRA Arbitration Rules
David C. Boch,Michael C. Moran, August 22, 2014
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has provided a measure of clarity in limiting the definition of a “customer” who may bring a FINRA arbitration under FINRA Rule 12200. The decision is significant for those member firms that provide a broad array of financial services...

Anti-Money Laundering Customer Due Diligence
K. Michael Carlton,Barry N. Hurwitz,Andrew B. Kales,W. John McGuire,Carl A. Valenstein, August 11, 2014
On July 30, 2014, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued proposed regulations seeking to clarify and strengthen the customer due diligence obligations of certain types of financial institutions aimed at preventing money laundering in the...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Purchase Report

Buy an atVantage Firm Profile for insight into a law firm's litigation, bankruptcy, corporate transaction and patent prosecution experience.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.