Borton Petrini, LLP
Size of Organization: 50 Year Established: 1899 Web Site: http://www.bortonpetrini.com
Telephone: (661) 322-3051
Fax: (661) 322-4628
Voice Mail: (661) 395-6700
| |
Profile Visibility 
#557 in weekly profile views out of 270,734 total law firms Overall |
|
|
|
|
| Admiralty/Maritime Law | Agricultural Law |
| Appellate Practice | Arbitration |
| Banking Law | Bankruptcy Law |
| Business Law | Civil Trial Practice |
| Commercial Litigation | Construction Law |
| Corporate Law | Elder Law |
| Eminent Domain | Environmental Law |
| Government Relations | Guardianship and Conservatorship |
| Health Care Law | Insurance Defense |
| Intellectual Property Law | Labor and Employment Law |
| Land Use Law | Mergers and Acquisitions |
| Municipal and Zoning Law | Natural Resources Law |
| Partnership Law | Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Unfair Competition |
| Premises Liability | Professional Liability |
| Real Estate Law | Toxic Torts |
| Transportation Law | Trusts and Estates, Wills and Probate |
|
|
Learn More |
Since 1899, Borton Petrini, LLP has offered high quality legal services in all of the practice areas described above through its California network of ten regional offices. The mission of Borton Petrini, LLP is to treat every file as though we were representing ourselves and paying the bill for that representation.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Borton Petrini, LLP:
Civil Rights (4 cases in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Borton Petrini, LLP:
20
Client Review
Total number of Client Reviews for Borton Petrini, LLP:
3
Documents by Borton Petrini, LLP on Martindale.com
| |
California Court Issues Favorable Decision for EmployersJonathan P. Geen, April 1, 2013
In the recent decision of Dutra v. Mercy Medical Center of Mt. Shasta (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 750, the Court of Appeal for the Third District issued a decision that is a win for employers in that the court held California Labor Code section 132(a) that extends protection to employees injured in the...