Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Law Firm Profile > Practice Areas & Industries > Group Profile

Practice Areas & Industries: Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC

 



Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC

Intellectual Property Litigation Return to Practice Areas & Industries

Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

Butler Snow's Intellectual Property Group has extensive experience in complex intellectual property, anti-trust and unfair competition litigation, including matters concerning trademark, copyright and patent infringement, false advertising, trade secret misappropriation, trade dress infringement, domain name disputes and franchise termination. Our attorneys are experienced in all areas of intellectual property, technology commercialization, domestic and international licensing.

Our clients range from multinational organizations with established worldwide intellectual property and technology interests to individuals and start-up entities entering the domestic or international marketplace for the first time. We are focused on providing the specialized assistance needed for today's complex technology and intellectual property issues.

Butler Snow avoids a "one size fits all" case/claim management work plan for IP litigation. Our strategy depends on the size and complexity of the matter, the business goals, whether our client will be the plaintiff or defendant, the role of in-house counsel and the level of involvement by the business people. The development of strategy begins in the initial steps and is updated regularly.


 

Services Available

  • Our general trial strategy is to marshal the proof around the desired theme of the case, developed in consultation with the client and, in a number of cases, with experts and consultants.
  • While many firms approach all cases with a defense mentality, Butler Snow recognizes that in commercial cases and IP cases the client may be taking an offensive rather than defensive posture.
  • Butler Snow has provided leadership in managing document discovery where the client was not prepared to provide these services internally. Through our Summation iBlaze software, we can manage hundreds of thousands of documents and multiple depositions.
  • At trial, our Information Technology (IT) Litigation Support Group assists in the presentation of evidence through the use of TrialDirector, including thousands of potential trial exhibits as well as multiple deposition excerpts.
  • Butler Snow has the flexibility to follow a client's established procedures for document discovery and collaboration. We currently access various document management systems at client offices and client data repositories through secure VPN connections. We also work with several third-party internet-based document repositories where this best suits the client's needs.
  • We believe an early, aggressive discovery plan is beneficial to the client because of the need to prepare for temporary and preliminary injunction hearings. The injunction hearing phase of the case is crucial because a favorable outcome at this stage often results in a quick resolution of the matter. Therefore we prepare for and treat the hearings as the "trial" of the case.
  • Our intellectual property attorneys are well recognized by their peers in The Best Lawyers in America®. They are regularly invited to speak at seminars and roundtables, and the firm regularly hosts intellectual property litigation roundtables for the American Bar Association.

Representative Experience

  • Federal Express v. Accu-Sort Systems Inc. – Butler Snow represented Federal Express Corporation as plaintiff against AccuSort Systems, Inc., the world’s largest supplier of bar code scanning technology. This case involved claims of breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets and technology, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with FedEx’s contract with AccuSort to design a mass scanning dimension system (MSDS) which dimensionally weighs boxes via a field of lasers and permits the accurate charge to the customer for actual costs of shipping. The suit alleged that AccuSort manufactured MSDS units for UPS in violation of its contracts. Prior to trial the Court granted summary judgment to FedEx on the antitrust counterclaim of AccuSort. Then, after several days of trial, the parties agreed to a settlement which was very favorable for our client FedEx.
  • Gnesys, Inc. v. Boyd Greene & Associates Inc., U.S. District Court (W.D. Tenn.). Following the defendant’s violation of an injunction, Butler Snow successfully obtained an order of contempt, damages (both actual and exemplary) and attorneys’ fees on behalf of the plaintiff in this action involving patent infringement and trademark infringement. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court decision in all respects.
  • Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc., 109 F.3d 739 (Fed. Cir. 1997). The firm served as lead counsel for defendant coaxial cable manufacturers in a patent infringement action seeking $132 million in royalties and attorneys' fees. The case was dismissed by summary judgment on grounds of non-infringement, and was affirmed on appeal.