Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP New York, NY Document Search Results (69)
Show: results per page
|M&A Update: Delaware Court Upholds Sotheby’s Poison Pill Defense Against Activist Citing “Negative Control” as a Corporate Threat|
Jason M. Halper, Gregory A. Markel, Braden McCurrach, William P. Mills, Martin L. Seidel; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
May 7, 2014, previously published on May 5, 2014 In a May 2, 2014 ruling relating to activist hedge fund Third Point LLC’s proxy battle with auction house Sotheby’s, the Delaware Chancery Court found that Third Point was not likely to succeed in its argument that the Sotheby’s board violated its fiduciary duties when it adopted...
|Going Public: Powhatan Energy Fund’s “Insurance Policy” Regarding FERC Enforcement’s Non-Public Manipulation Investigation into the Fund’s “High-Frequency” PJM Trading Activity|
Lynna Cobrall, Gregory K. Lawrence; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
May 7, 2014, previously published on May 5, 2014 On February 28, 2014, Powhatan Energy Fund (“Powhatan”) launched a public website disclosing that for more than three years, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) Office of Enforcement (“OE”) has been investigating Powhatan for alleged manipulation of...
|Federal Circuit Rules No Per Se Prohibition Against Injunctions for FRAND - Encumbered Standard Essential Patents|
Cadwalader Wickersham Taft LLP;
May 2, 2014, previously published on April 30, 2014On April 25, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in the appeal from Judge Posner’s ruling that denied both Motorola and Apple damages and injunctive relief in Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. This decision not only revived Apple and...
|Chancery Court Provides Another Lesson for a Reasonable Sale Process|
Jason M. Halper, William P. Mills, Martin L. Seidel; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
May 2, 2014, previously published on April 30, 2014In a recent decision, Chen v. Howard-Anderson, the Delaware Chancery Court once again questioned the reasonableness of how a board conducted the sale of a company when it permitted stockholder claims to go to trial. The decision provides yet another reminder—if one is needed—that boards...
|M&A Update: New Rules Will Limit Shareholders’ Tax-Free Treatment on Inversions|
Linda Z. Swartz; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 29, 2014, previously published on April 25, 2014In what may be the first of a series of steps, the government took decisive action today to ensure that shareholders of US companies inverting by merger must pay tax on the transfer of their US company shares if they hold a majority of the combined company’s equity.
|SEC SBSD Recordkeeping and Reporting Proposal|
Steven Lofchie, Nihal S. Patel, Jeffrey L. Robins; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 25, 2014, previously published on April 23, 2014The SEC has published proposed recordkeeping, reporting and capital deficiency notification requirements that would apply to security-based swap dealers ("SBSDs") and major security-based swap participants ("MSBSPs") as well as to other SEC-registered broker-dealers that enter...
|M&A Update: Ohio Federal Judge Blocks Controlling Stockholder’s Tender Offer Based On Target Board’s Conflicts and Stockholder Coercion|
Joshua Apfelroth, Jason M. Halper, William P. Mills, Martin L. Seidel; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 23, 2014, previously published on April 17, 2014 In a March 14, 2014 decision that has received little commentary, an Ohio federal court in Spachman v. Great American Insurance Co. took the extraordinary step of enjoining a tender offer by Great American Insurance, a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Financial Group, for the 48 percent of...
|First Amendment and Off-Label Promotion - Prosecute What I Do, Not What I Say|
Bret A. Campbell, Jason Jurgens, Adam S. Lurie, Brian T. McGovern, Martin L. Seidel; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 23, 2014, previously published on April 21, 2014 On December 3, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the conviction of Alfred Caronia (“Caronia”), who had been tried and convicted of participating in an unlawful conspiracy to introduce a misbranded drug into interstate commerce in violation of the...
|The ITC Has Jurisdiction Over Digital File Transmissions Under Section 337|
Alexander J. Hadjis, Chao Huang, Kristin L. Yohannan; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 23, 2014, previously published on April 21, 2014 On April 3, 2014, the U.S. International Trade Commission has issued a notice in Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for Use in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances, the Appliances Made Therefrom, and Methods of Making Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-833,...
|U.S. District Court Confirms FTC Authority to Regulate Corporate Data Security Practices|
Keith M. Gerver, Peter J. Isajiw, Peter Moll, Kenneth L. Wainstein; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 20, 2014, previously published on April 11, 2014On April 7, 2014, Judge Esther Salas of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the first ever motion to dismiss filed in Federal court that challenged the authority of the Federal Trade Commission (“the FTC”) to regulate corporate data security practices under...