Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Washington, DC Document Search Results (39)

 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLRecent Court and Agency Actions Suggest Increased Antitrust Risk Over Disgorgement, Particularly in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Andrew J. Forman, Daniel J. Howley, Charles F. (Rick) Rule, Eric Sega; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 13, 2015, previously published on May 05, 2015
Recent court and agency rulings highlight important takeaways involving disgorgement in antitrust proceedings. Companies, especially those in the pharmaceutical industry, increasingly should ensure they properly calibrate the potential for disgorgement in their antitrust risk calculus.

 

HTMLWhat Did April Bring?: FERC Extends Out-of-Market Reliability Measures but Wants Market-Based Solutions
Gregory K. Lawrence, Thomas Reid Millar, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 6, 2015, previously published on Apr 30, 2015
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) recently published two orders that approved capacity and reliability measures for the Independent System Operator New England Inc. (“ISO-NE”) and the New York Independent System Operator (“NYISO”). In contrast to...

 

HTMLSupreme Court’s Holding in Oneok v. Learjet Could Lead to New Risks for Market Participants
Joseph J. Bial, Daniel J. Howley, Gregory K. Lawrence, Thomas Reid Millar, Natalie Mitchell; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 6, 2015, previously published on Apr 29, 2015
On April 21, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Oneok v. Learjet,1 holding that “Respondents’ state-law antitrust claims are not within the field of matters pre-empted by the Natural Gas Act”2 even though the claimed violations “affected . . . federally regulated wholesale...

 

HTMLA Signal of Things to Come? New CME Rule 512 Reflects Modified Stance for Violations of Futures and Options Reporting Requirements
Athena Yvonne Eastwood, Jonathan H. Flynn, Neal E. Kumar, Gregory George Mocek, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 27, 2015, previously published on April 13, 2015
On March 24, 2015, the CME Group, Inc. (“CME”) announced a proposed amendment to Rule 512 indicating that it will impose a minimum fine of $1,000 for repeat violations of its exchanges’ reporting rules for futures and options. The amendment, which became effective on April 7, 2015...

 

HTMLDepartment of Justice Antitrust Division Charges Former E-Commerce Executive with Price-Fixing in First Ever Online Marketplace Prosecution
Joseph J. Bial, Anthony V. Nanni, Charles F. (Rick) Rule, Eric Sega; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 17, 2015, previously published on April 7, 2015
On April 6, 2015, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division announced that David Topkins, a former executive of an e-commerce seller of wall décor, had pled guilty to a one-count felony charge for conspiring to fix the prices of certain posters sold in the United States through Amazon...

 

HTMLTruthful . . . but Not Forthcoming? FERC Staff Takes Aggressive View of Material Omissions as Basis for Intent in Maxim Power
Gregory K. Lawrence, Thomas Reid Millar, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 17, 2015, previously published on March 30, 2015
Recent positions taken by FERC’s Enforcement Staff in the Maxim Power show cause proceeding add to the uncertainty regarding what information market participants must volunteer when communicating with the Commission, ISOs/RTOs, market monitors and others. We have recently written about Maxim...

 

HTMLCFTC Issues No-Action Relief for Amended Legacy Swaps between SDs and SPVs
Douglas J. Donahue, Ivan Loncar, Paul J. Pantano, Nihal S. Patel; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 17, 2015, previously published on April 1, 2015
On March 31, 2015, the Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight (the “Division”) of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) issued no-action relief regarding compliance with certain of its swap regulations, including, but not limited to, business...

 

HTMLFinCEN Assesses $1 Million Penalty and Seeks to Bar Former MoneyGram Executive from Financial Industry
Jodi L. Avergun, James A. Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 14, 2015, previously published on December 22, 2014
On December 18, 2014, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) assessed a $1 million civil monetary penalty against Thomas E. Haider, former Chief Compliance Officer at MoneyGram International Inc., for allegedly failing to ensure that his company complied with the anti-money...

 

HTMLThe Suprema Federal Circuit En Banc Hearing: The Full Court's Decision May Impact the ITC's Remedial Authority
Alexander J. Hadjis, Tihua Huang, Steven L. Rushing, Kristin L. Yohannan; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 26, 2015, previously published on February 20, 2015
On February 5, 2015, the Federal Circuit sat en banc and heard oral argument after vacating a panel decision in Suprema, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 742 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2013). The panel decided that the ITC lacks statutory authority to enter an exclusion order to remedy the induced...

 

HTMLCourt Finds CFTC RTO/ISO Exemptive Order Bars CEA § 22 Private Right of Action, but More to Come from the CFTC
Gregory K. Lawrence, Christopher J. Polito, Lamiya Rahman; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
March 26, 2015, previously published on February 17, 2015
Can private litigants bring claims under the Commodity Exchange Act alleging manipulation in ERCOT’s energy markets? On February 3, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas answered “no,” granting defendants’ motion to dismiss in Aspire Commodities v. GDF...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  Next