Home > Legal Library > Advanced Search > Search Results









Join Matindale-Hubbell Connected



Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Washington, DC Document Search Results (40)

 

View Page: 1  2  3  4  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:
Sponsored Results

HTMLTariff Compliance Is Not Enough: FERC Imposes Nearly Thirty-Five Million Dollars in Penalties and Disgorgement against Powhatan Energy Fund and Its Trading Associates
Doron F. Ezickson, Thomas Reid Millar, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 18, 2015, previously published on June 2, 2015
On May 29, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an Order against Powhatan Energy Fund, LLC and its trading partners, Dr. Houlihan Chen, HEEP Fund, LLC and CU Fund, Inc. (together, “Powhatan”). FERC imposed civil monetary penalties of more than $29...

 

HTMLSuch A Fact Pattern Does Not A $5 Million Penalty Make.
Doron F. Ezickson, Thomas Reid Millar, Katherine Vorhis; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 18, 2015, previously published on May 19, 2015
Or so says one dissenting FERC Commissioner in the recent Maxim Power enforcement proceeding.1 On May 1, 2015, FERC issued an order assessing civil penalties (the “Order”) of $5 million against Maxim Power Corporation and its named subsidiaries (“Maxim”),2 as well as $50,000...

 

HTMLCFTC Issues Proposed Order to Exempt Certain SPP Transactions from Regulation Under Most Provisions of the CEA and CFTC Rules
Sohair A. Aguirre, Paul J. Pantano, Lamiya Rahman; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 16, 2015, previously published on May 21, 2015
On May 19, 2015, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) issued an order in response to an application from Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (“SPP”) proposing to exempt three categories of SPP transactions (“Covered Transactions”)...

 

HTMLA Looming Crisis: Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Statute Reducing Benefits
Ingrid Bagby, Thomas J. Curtin, Mark C. Ellenberg, Daniel Gwen, Ellen Halstead; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 16, 2015, previously published on May 19, 2015
On May 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois struck down recently enacted state public pension reform legislation on the grounds that the legislation violated the “pension protection clause” of the Illinois constitution. The legislation had sought to reduce...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Holds That Orders Denying Plan Confirmation Are Not Final for Appellate Purposes
Ingrid Bagby, Mark C. Ellenberg, Casey John Servais, Christopher J. Updike; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 16, 2015, previously published on May 21, 2015
On May 4, 2015, a unanimous United States Supreme Court in Bullard v. Blue Hills, 135 S. Ct. 1686 (2015), resolved a long-standing circuit court split by holding that a bankruptcy court’s order denying confirmation of a debtor’s proposed bankruptcy plan is not a “final”...

 

HTMLCrowley Executive Acquittal in Price Fixing Trial Highlights Importance of Evaluating Legitimate Defenses and Avoiding Costly Plea Agreements
Joseph J. Bial, Daniel J. Howley, Anthony V. Nanni, Charles F. (Rick) Rule, Eric Sega; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 25, 2015, previously published on May 18, 2015
A federal jury’s recent acquittal of a shipping company executive charged with price fixing highlights the challenges and uncertainties the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) faces when defendants force DOJ to prove its case at trial. It also highlights the...

 

HTMLRecent Court and Agency Actions Suggest Increased Antitrust Risk Over Disgorgement, Particularly in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Andrew J. Forman, Daniel J. Howley, Charles F. (Rick) Rule, Eric Sega; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 13, 2015, previously published on May 05, 2015
Recent court and agency rulings highlight important takeaways involving disgorgement in antitrust proceedings. Companies, especially those in the pharmaceutical industry, increasingly should ensure they properly calibrate the potential for disgorgement in their antitrust risk calculus.

 

HTMLWhat Did April Bring?: FERC Extends Out-of-Market Reliability Measures but Wants Market-Based Solutions
Gregory K. Lawrence, Thomas Reid Millar, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 6, 2015, previously published on Apr 30, 2015
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) recently published two orders that approved capacity and reliability measures for the Independent System Operator New England Inc. (“ISO-NE”) and the New York Independent System Operator (“NYISO”). In contrast to...

 

HTMLSupreme Court’s Holding in Oneok v. Learjet Could Lead to New Risks for Market Participants
Joseph J. Bial, Daniel J. Howley, Gregory K. Lawrence, Thomas Reid Millar, Natalie Mitchell; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
May 6, 2015, previously published on Apr 29, 2015
On April 21, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Oneok v. Learjet,1 holding that “Respondents’ state-law antitrust claims are not within the field of matters pre-empted by the Natural Gas Act”2 even though the claimed violations “affected . . . federally regulated wholesale...

 

HTMLA Signal of Things to Come? New CME Rule 512 Reflects Modified Stance for Violations of Futures and Options Reporting Requirements
Athena Yvonne Eastwood, Jonathan H. Flynn, Neal E. Kumar, Gregory George Mocek, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
April 27, 2015, previously published on April 13, 2015
On March 24, 2015, the CME Group, Inc. (“CME”) announced a proposed amendment to Rule 512 indicating that it will impose a minimum fine of $1,000 for repeat violations of its exchanges’ reporting rules for futures and options. The amendment, which became effective on April 7, 2015...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  Next