Document(s) published by this organization: 98
Show: results per page
|The ITC Has Jurisdiction Over Digital File Transmissions Under Section 337|
Alexander J. Hadjis, Chao Huang, Kristin L. Yohannan; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 23, 2014, previously published on April 21, 2014 On April 3, 2014, the U.S. International Trade Commission has issued a notice in Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for Use in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances, the Appliances Made Therefrom, and Methods of Making Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-833,...
|US DOJ’s First Successful Extradition Based on Antitrust Charges|
Joseph J. Bial, Alec J. Burnside, Samer B. Korkor, Anthony V. Nanni, Charles F. (Rick) Rule; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 21, 2014, previously published on April 16, 2014On Friday, April 4, 2014, the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) announced that, for the first time ever, the DOJ successfully extradited “an alleged price-fixer” on an antitrust charge. Romano Pisciotti, a 62 year old Italian national traveling...
|Cross-Border RTS Starts Countdown for EMIR Obligations for Non-EU Counterparties|
Assia Damianova, Doron F. Ezickson, Nick Shiren, Adam Topping; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 21, 2014, previously published on April 11, 2014OTC derivative contracts which have a counterparty located outside of the European Union (“EU”) may now be subject to the requirements of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”).
|The Federal Circuit Considers Petitions for Rehearing Suprema — Its Decision Defining The ITC’s Authority to Police Induced Infringement|
Alexander J. Hadjis, Tihua Huang, Kristin L. Yohannan; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 20, 2014, previously published on April 7, 2014The International Trade Commission and Cross Match Technologies Inc. requested rehearing of the December panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Suprema Inc. and Mentalix Inc. v. U.S. International Trade Commission. In Suprema, the panel concluded that the ITC has no...
|FTC Continues Aggressive Posture on Reverse Payment Settlement Agreements with Reference to Disgorgement|
Andrew J. Forman, Daniel J. Howley, Jessica Michaels, Charles F. (Rick) Rule; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 20, 2014, previously published on April 3, 2014In two recent statements, the FTC reaffirmed its intention aggressively to pursue reverse-payment patent settlement agreements in the pharmaceutical industry.
|DOJ and FTC Release Joint Antitrust Policy Statement Regarding Sharing of Cybersecurity Information|
Keith M. Gerver, Jonathan S. Kanter, Nandu Machiraju, Kenneth L. Wainstein; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 20, 2014, previously published on April 15, 2014On April 10, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued an Antitrust Policy Statement on Sharing of Cybersecurity Information explaining that competitors can share legitimate threat information so long as appropriate...
|U.S. District Court Confirms FTC Authority to Regulate Corporate Data Security Practices|
Keith M. Gerver, Peter J. Isajiw, Peter Moll, Kenneth L. Wainstein; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
April 20, 2014, previously published on April 11, 2014On April 7, 2014, Judge Esther Salas of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the first ever motion to dismiss filed in Federal court that challenged the authority of the Federal Trade Commission (“the FTC”) to regulate corporate data security practices under...
|UK Budget 2014 - Key Tax Measures|
Adam Blakemore, Catherine Richardson; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
March 24, 2014, previously published on March 20, 2014Apart from personal taxation measures intended to be attractive to voters, the Budget is perhaps much less controversial than in previous years. Many of the detailed taxation provisions intended for inclusion in Finance Bill 2014 were foreshadowed in the Autumn Statement by the Chancellor of the...
|M&A Update: Delaware Court’s Orchard Enterprises Decision Provides Key Insights For Special Committees In Controlling Stockholder Transactions|
Joshua Apfelroth, Jason M. Halper, William P. Mills, Martin L. Seidel; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
March 21, 2014, previously published on March 19, 2014On March 14, 2014, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the Court of Chancery’s 2013 decision in In re MFW Shareholders Litigation, holding that in going-private mergers where there is a controlling stockholder, the use of both a truly independent special committee and a majority of the minority...
|Supreme Court Holds That Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision Applies To Employees Of Investment Advisers And Other Private Companies|
William J. Foley, Jason M. Halper, Adam S. Lurie, Lambrina Mathews; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
March 20, 2014, previously published on March 18, 2014On March 4, 2013, the Supreme Court issued an opinion with broad implications for mutual funds and certain other SEC-regulated companies that conduct business through or with privately-held entities (such as investment advisers and managers), as well as the private companies that do business with...