Legal Articles: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 75


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLSupreme Court Rejects EPA Mercury Emissions Rule
Athena Yvonne Eastwood, Douglas H. Fischer; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 23, 2015, previously published on July 15, 2015
On June 29, 2015, the Supreme Court cast serious doubt upon the future of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (“MATS”) by finding that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) failed to adequately consider the costs of the rule as part of its initial decision to issue...

 

Adobe PDFInvesting in the United States: CFIUS Concerns for Chinese Investors
Keith M. Gerver, Viola Jing, Michael Liu, Jane Ng; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 15, 2015, previously published on July 9, 2015
Michael Liu, Jane Ng, Viola Jing and Keith Gerver have authored a Clients & Friends Memo to discuss the latest trends in reviews conducted by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) for Chinese investors contemplating possible investments in U.S. assets. The Memo...

 

HTMLRemit: The Road to Enforcement
Doron F. Ezickson, Adam Topping; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
July 14, 2015, previously published on July 2, 2015
Following a number of recent developments, described below, the rules and regulations enacted under the European Union (EU) Regulation on Wholesale Energy Markets Integrity and Transparency (REMIT) are now close to being fully-implemented. Market participants must ensure they are now prepared for...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Upholds Premium Subsidies in 34 States with Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces
Christina T. Holder, Pamela Landman, Stephanie Marcantonio, Paul W. Mourning; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2015, previously published on June 25, 2015
Today the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its much anticipated decision in King v. Burwell, a case challenging the legality of Federal subsidies provided to individuals in the 34 States that did not establish State-based American Health Benefit Exchanges (“State Exchanges”), and instead...

 

HTMLSecond Circuit Holds Application of State Usury Laws to Third-Party Debt Purchasers Not Preempted by National Bank Act
Nathan Bull, Scott A. Cammarn, Michael S. Gambro, Stuart N. Goldstein, Jordan M. Schwartz; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 23, 2015, previously published on June 8, 2015
On May 22, 2015, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC1 (“Madden”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the application of state usury laws to third-party assignees is not preempted by the National Bank Act (the “NBA”) but rather such assignees...

 

HTMLTariff Compliance Is Not Enough: FERC Imposes Nearly Thirty-Five Million Dollars in Penalties and Disgorgement against Powhatan Energy Fund and Its Trading Associates
Doron F. Ezickson, Thomas Reid Millar, Mary Treanor; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 18, 2015, previously published on June 2, 2015
On May 29, 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an Order against Powhatan Energy Fund, LLC and its trading partners, Dr. Houlihan Chen, HEEP Fund, LLC and CU Fund, Inc. (together, “Powhatan”). FERC imposed civil monetary penalties of more than $29...

 

HTMLSuch A Fact Pattern Does Not A $5 Million Penalty Make.
Doron F. Ezickson, Thomas Reid Millar, Katherine Vorhis; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 18, 2015, previously published on May 19, 2015
Or so says one dissenting FERC Commissioner in the recent Maxim Power enforcement proceeding.1 On May 1, 2015, FERC issued an order assessing civil penalties (the “Order”) of $5 million against Maxim Power Corporation and its named subsidiaries (“Maxim”),2 as well as $50,000...

 

HTMLA Looming Crisis: Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Statute Reducing Benefits
Ingrid Bagby, Thomas J. Curtin, Mark C. Ellenberg, Daniel Gwen, Ellen Halstead; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 16, 2015, previously published on May 19, 2015
On May 8, 2015, the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois struck down recently enacted state public pension reform legislation on the grounds that the legislation violated the “pension protection clause” of the Illinois constitution. The legislation had sought to reduce...

 

HTMLCFTC Issues Proposed Order to Exempt Certain SPP Transactions from Regulation Under Most Provisions of the CEA and CFTC Rules
Sohair A. Aguirre, Paul J. Pantano, Lamiya Rahman; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 16, 2015, previously published on May 21, 2015
On May 19, 2015, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) issued an order in response to an application from Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (“SPP”) proposing to exempt three categories of SPP transactions (“Covered Transactions”)...

 

HTMLSupreme Court Holds That Orders Denying Plan Confirmation Are Not Final for Appellate Purposes
Ingrid Bagby, Mark C. Ellenberg, Casey John Servais, Christopher J. Updike; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
June 16, 2015, previously published on May 21, 2015
On May 4, 2015, a unanimous United States Supreme Court in Bullard v. Blue Hills, 135 S. Ct. 1686 (2015), resolved a long-standing circuit court split by holding that a bankruptcy court’s order denying confirmation of a debtor’s proposed bankruptcy plan is not a “final”...

 


View Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next