Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Size of Organization: 650
Year Established: 1792Web Site: http://www.cadwalader.com
Telephone: (212) 504-6000
Fax: (212) 504-6666
|Profile Visibility |
#74 in weekly profile views out of 281,296 total law firms Overall
As one of the oldest law firms in the United States, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, founded in downtown New York in 1792, is proud of more than 200 years of service to many of the country's and the world's most prestigious institutions. With a rich history, our lawyers have participated in many of the most significant social, economic and legal issues accompanying the growth of the United States. These well-established roots have led us to also become one of the world's most prominent law firms, with influence that has expanded around the globe as we advise clients with interests in Europe, South America and the Pacific Rim. In the process, we have established long-standing relationships with many of the world's premier financial institutions, Fortune 500 companies and other leading corporations, government entities, charitable and health care organizations, and individual private clients. With offices in New York, London, Charlotte, Washington, Beijing, Hong Kong, Houston and Brussels, we offer clients innovative solutions to legal and financial issues in a wide range of areas.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP:
Securities (16 cases in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Total number of U.S. granted patents by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP:
5 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP:
Total number of Client Reviews for Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP:
Documents by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on Martindale.com
Supreme Court Upholds Premium Subsidies in 34 States with Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces
Christina T. Holder,Pamela Landman,Stephanie Marcantonio,Paul W. Mourning, June 26, 2015
Today the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its much anticipated decision in King v. Burwell, a case challenging the legality of Federal subsidies provided to individuals in the 34 States that did not establish State-based American Health Benefit Exchanges (“State Exchanges”), and instead...
Second Circuit Holds Application of State Usury Laws to Third-Party Debt Purchasers Not Preempted by National Bank Act
Nathan Bull,Scott A. Cammarn,Michael S. Gambro,Stuart N. Goldstein,Jordan M. Schwartz, June 23, 2015
On May 22, 2015, in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC1 (“Madden”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the application of state usury laws to third-party assignees is not preempted by the National Bank Act (the “NBA”) but rather such assignees...
Such A Fact Pattern Does Not A $5 Million Penalty Make.
Doron F. Ezickson,Thomas Reid Millar,Katherine Vorhis, June 18, 2015
Or so says one dissenting FERC Commissioner in the recent Maxim Power enforcement proceeding.1 On May 1, 2015, FERC issued an order assessing civil penalties (the “Order”) of $5 million against Maxim Power Corporation and its named subsidiaries (“Maxim”),2 as well as $50,000...
Top 10 Appearances for Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on Martindale.com