Carlock, Copeland & Stair, LLP
A Partnership including Professional Corporations
Size of Organization: 92
Year Established: 1970Web Site: http://www.carlockcopeland.com
Fax: 404-523-2345; 404-222-9482
|Profile Visibility |
#344 in weekly profile views out of 281,682 total law firms Overall
|Civil Trial Practice||Insurance Defense|
For more than 35 years, the attorneys of Carlock, Copeland & Stair, LLP have excelled in the defense of civil litigation matters involving tort and commercial claims for our clients. Our attorneys are skilled in advocating the rights of our clients and advising them on litigated and non-litigated matters. With offices in Atlanta, Georgia and Charleston, South Carolina, we regularly practice in all state courts and federal courts, state administrative agencies, and federal administrative agencies in Georgia, South Carolina and other states. Our clients included insured individuals, businesses of all sizes, primary insurers, excess insurers and third-party administrators. Please visit our website at www.carlockcopeland.com for complete firm information.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Carlock, Copeland & Stair, LLP:
Documents by Carlock, Copeland & Stair, LLP on Martindale.com
Conscientious Tenants Aren’t “Real Estate Managers” Under Homeowner’s Policy
Melissa L. Bailey, March 10, 2015
The Eleventh Circuit recently upheld a district court’s grant of summary judgment to an insurer in a coverage dispute regarding the death of a two year old child. In Moon v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., the homeowner’s policyholder leased the insured home to his son and daughter-in-law. Moon,...
Eleventh Circuit holds that Standard for Georgia ROR is "Adequacy"
L. Elizabeth Albright, November 10, 2014
In evaluating whether an insurer made a proper reservation of rights (ROR), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unpublished opinion, held that whether the insurer fairly informed the insured of its coverage position is the proper standard in assessing whether coverage defenses were...