Carly Chu is a member of the Labor and Employment Department. Carly's practice focuses on the representation of public and private employers in issues related to the workplace. She has experience with cases arising under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, ERISA, and other state and federal employment statutes and regulations.
Memberships & Affiliations
· Cincinnati Bar Association
· Federal Bar Association
Experience
Sandra Hodges v. Psychiatric Professional Services, Inc.
Psychiatric Professional Services, Inc.
Defended against claims of age discrimination, gender discrimination, FMLA retaliation, promissory estoppel, and violation of public policy.
Michael Munoz v. WorlflowOne, et. al.
WorlflowOne, et. al.
Defended against claims of fraud brought by a former employee.
Vernetta Pitts v. GGNSC, Albany
GGNSC, Albany
Received summary judgment on plaintiff's wrongful termination in violation of public policy claim.
Valerie Reed v. Beverly Enterprises - Alabama, Inc.
Beverly Enterprises - Alabama, Inc.
Defended against claims of sexual harassment.
Gregory Gerard and Michael Serraino v. Innomark Communications, et. al.
Innomark Communications, et. al.
Defended against age discrimination and FMLA retaliation case.
Carlotta Cook v. Liquid Containers, et. al.
Liquid Containers, et. al.
Defended against claims of age discrimination, retaliation, slander per quod, slander per se, wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Libra Hanlin v. GE Consumer Finance, Inc.
GE Consumer Finance, Inc.
Obtained favorable settlement of Ohio Civil Rights Commission "probable cause" finding.
Jennifer Korte v. Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC
Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC
Defended against claims of pregnancy discrimination.
Publications
November 15, 2010, Overtime Exceptions? Exemptions!
August 31, 2010, New Ohio Law Mandates Leave for Military Families
December 8, 2008, Time for a Change in the Employment Litigation Arena
August 29, 2008, Sixth Circuit Defines New Summary Judgment Test For Mixed-Motive Cases Under Title VII