|
Profile Visibility  | | #333 in weekly profile views out of 1,493 lawyers in Alexandria, Virginia | | #190,627 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Patent Litigation; Patent Interferences | | | Education | Columbia University, LL.B., 1968; George Washington University, LL.M., in Patent/Trade Regulation Law, 1973, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (B.S.M.E./B.S.Ec., 1965) | | | Admitted | 1969, New York; 1970-1982, U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals; 1971, U.S. Court of Claims; 1972, District of Columbia; 1977, Virginia; 1982, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office | |
| Memberships | The District of Columbia Bar (Member, Steering Committee, Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law Division, 1984-1986; Vice Chairman, 1985-1986); American Bar Association (Member, Patent, Trademark and Copyright Law Section; Chairman, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Subcommittee, Federal Practice and Procedure Committee, 1982-1983); American Intellectual Property Law Association (Chairman, Giles Sutherland Rich Moot Court Competition Subcommittee, 1973-1975; Ad Hoc Committee, Proposed Single Court of Patent Appeals, 1978-1979; Chairman, Interference Law and Practice Subcommittee of the Interference Committee, 1983-1984; Chairman, Interference Committee, 1988-1990; Vice-Chairman, Amicus Committee, 1990-1991; Chairman, Amicus Committee, 1994-1996); Association of Former Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Law Clerks and Technical Advisors (President, 1978-1979). | | | Born | Hastings, Minnesota, March 26, 1944 | | | Biography | Assistant Technical Advisor and Law Clerk to Honorable Giles S. Rich, U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, 1970-1972. Author of numerous articles concerning Intellectual Property Law. Lecturer in Law, George Mason University School of Law, 1992-1995. | | | ISLN | 907123154 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Can Counsel for an Interferent Represent an Independent Fact Witness at a Deposition?Charles L. Gholz, April 17, 2009, previously published by Intellectual Property Today on February 2009 This article is, in a sense, a follow on to Gholz and Parker, It's OK to Pay Fact Witnesses for Their Time, 13 Intellectual Property Today No. 10 at page 16 (2006). That article makes the point that there is nothing unethical about paying an independent fact witness for his or her time and...
Is It Ok To Lie To Opposing Counsel?Charles L. Gholz, Kenneth D. Wilcox, April 17, 2009, previously published by Intellectual Property Today on April 2009 President Clinton got into trouble because he lied under oath, not because he lied. If he'd only lied to his wife, his lies would have been of concern only to the two of them -- or so we believe.
|
|
|
RSS | Blog | Advertising Opportunities | Site Map | Contact Us
