- Labor and Employment
- Employment Disability Discrimination
- Wrongful Discharge
- Employment Law
- Retaliatory Discharge
|University ||University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, B.A., with honors, 2007|
|Law School||Columbia Law School, New York, NY, J.D., 2010|
Colin Calvert is an associate in the Irvine office. His practice includes all areas of labor and employment law, with a focus on claims of discrimination and harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, as well as class action wage and hour lawsuits.
Colin's practice also includes traditional labor relations work, including collective bargaining, labor grievances, and arbitrations.
While in law school Colin clerked with the Labor Relations Section of the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office.
Romancing the Workplace
August 3, 2012
Four Year Statute of Limitation For Claims Brought Pursuant to 42 USC 1981
August 10, 2011
Employees Beware: The Ninth Circuit Finds That Unauthorized Access To An Employer's Computer May Create Criminal Liability Under The Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
May 3, 2011
In California FEHA Discrimination Case, Federal Courts Have Jurisdiction to Determine Whether Obtaining Security Clearance Was a Bona Fide Job Requirement
April 7, 2011
First Impression Decision: Under WARN Act Quitting Due to Business's Imminent Closing is Not Voluntary Departure
January 27, 2011
Ninth Circuit Holds Service Advisors Non-Exempt Under FLSA Dealership Salesman Exemption; Section 7(i) Exemption Is Still Available
March 25, 2015
The Alternative-Workweek: Oasis Or Mirage?
April 1, 2014
Managerial Exemption And Class Actions
April 1, 2013
Court Rules On Premium Payments For Denied Meal And Rest Periods
July 1, 2011
IE SHRM April Mixer
April 17, 2014
IE SHRM April Mixer - Riverside, CA
April 11, 2013
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Ninth Circuit Holds Service Advisors Non-Exempt Under FLSA Dealership "Salesman" Exemption; Section 7(i) Exemption Is Still Available
Colin P. Calvert,Todd B. Scherwin, April 7, 2015
The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (with jurisdiction over the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) has ruled in Navarro v. Encino Motorcars, LLC that Service Advisors employed by automobile dealerships do not qualify for the Section...
|Profile Visibility |
|#275 in weekly profile views out of 4,993 lawyers in Irvine, California|
|#105,816 in weekly profile views out of 1,675,662 total lawyers Overall|