|
Statement of Practice Summary: General Practice, including, but not limited to: Antitrust and Competition, Appellate, Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, Banking and Financial Services, Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Business Law, Civil Rights, Communications and Media, Copyrights, Corporate, Criminal, Election and Campaign Finance, Emerging Companies, Employee Benefits, Employment, Energy, Environmental, Food, Drug and Cosmetics, Government Contracts, Health Services, Information Services, Insurance, Intellectual Property, International, Information Technology and Internet, Latin America, Legislative, Litigation, Mergers and Acquisitions, Petroleum, Products Liability, Professional Responsibility, Real Estate, Securities, Sports, Taxation, Toxic Torts, Trade Associations, Trade Regulation, Trademarks, Transportation and Trusts and Estates. Documents by Lawyers at this office | |
Supreme Court Delivers Important Decision On Patent EligibilityPaul J. Berman,Natalie M. Derzko,Jeffrey B. Elikan,Ellen J. Flannery,Robert D. Fram,Andrea G. Reister,Christopher N. Sipes, March 28, 2012 The United States Supreme Court has delivered an important, though potentially limited, opinion on the scope of patentable subject matter. The decision may have significant ramifications for life science and medical device companies that—to protect innovation—rely upon method of use... Chinese Pharmaceutical Companies Fined For Antitrust ViolationsShaoyu Chen,Paul M. Claydon,Scott Cunningham,John D. Graubert,James J. O'Connell,James C. Snipes,Timothy P. Stratford, November 24, 2011 China’s National Development & Reform Commission (“NDRC”) announced this week that it has fined two domestic pharmaceutical companies for monopolizing bulk sales of promethazine hydrochloride in violation of the country’s Anti-Monopoly Law (“AML”). The... District Courts Split On Sec End-Run Around Supreme Court Janus DecisionTammy Albarrán,David B. Bayless,David L. Kornblau, September 29, 2011 District court judges in New York and San Francisco recently reached opposite conclusions on the SEC’s ongoing attempts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s decision this past June in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders 131 S. Ct. 2296 (2011). Janus sharply restricted the... (For complete biographical data on Washington, D.C., San Diego, California, Redwood Shores, California, New York, New York, London, England, Brussels, Belgium and Beijing, China Personnel, see those offices)
|
|