|
Profile Visibility  | | #20 in weekly profile views out of 5,101 lawyers in Columbus, Ohio | | #5,239 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Labor and Employment | | | Education | The Ohio State University, J.D., 1990, The University of Akron, B.A., cum laude, 1987 | | | Admitted | 1990, Ohio; 2002, New York; 2008, Arizona; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth, Sixth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits; U.S. District Court, Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan; U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana; U.S. District Court, Eastern and Southern Districts of New York; U.S. District Court, District of Arizona | |
| Born | Dover, Ohio, 1965 | | | Biography | (Also at Phoenix, Arizona and New York, N.Y. Offices) | | | ISLN | 911395189 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Supreme Court Rules Collective Bargaining Agreements Requiring Arbitration of Statutory Claims EnforceableTerry M. Billups, Alexandra A. Bodnar, D. Lewis Clark, Norman Davis, Susan M. DiMickele, Susan C. Hastings, Amy Ruth Ita, Michael W. Kelly, Merrell B. Renaud, April 24, 2009 In 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, a divided US Supreme Court held 5-4 that a provision in a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate claims arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) is enforceable as a matter of...
US Supreme Court Continues to Open the Floodgates for Retaliation Claims under Title VIITara Aschenbrand, Terry M. Billups, Alexandra A. Bodnar, D. Lewis Clark, Norman Davis, Susan C. Hastings, Michael W. Kelly, William A. Nolan, Merrell B. Renaud, Jeffrey J. Wedel, March 9, 2009 On January 26, 2009 the United States Supreme Court issued its latest decision broadening the circumstances under which employees can pursue retaliation claims against their employers under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Reduction in Force Considerations Expanded in New York's WARN ActD. Lewis Clark, Susan C. Hastings, William A. Nolan, Steven Skulnik, February 9, 2009 The New York Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (NY WARN Act), effective February 1, 2009, imposes requirements in addition to those under the current federal WARN Act, with wide-reaching implications for employers facing downsizings of New York-based employees.
|
|
|