Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Daniel Joseph Herling

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
44 Montgomery Street, 36th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Peer Rating
5.0 of 5.0
Client Rating
5.0 of 5.0
AV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Litigation; Consumer Product Safety; Complex Tort & Product-Related Litigation; Product Risk Management & Response; Health Care Enforcement Defense; E-Discovery & Records Management; Privacy & Security; International; Medical Technology; Health Care; Life Sciences; Retail & Consumer Products; Food Litigation
University of Dayton, B.S.
Law School
University of Dayton School of Law, J.D.
1979, Pennsylvania; 1982, California; United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Peer Reviews
AV Rated
Peer Rating
High Ethical Standard
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Client Reviews

Overall Client Rating

in Litigation
5.0 out of 5.0
Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money
  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client(s)
  • Last reviewed on 07/26/13
Posted by a Corporation on 07/26/13
5.0 out of 5.0  
At 6'7", Dan's physical presence is more than matched by his courtroom bearing and litigation savvy. In a complicated commercial matter, he was quickly able to identify the issues, assign the appropriate personnel, and bring a satisfactory resolution for my company. I highly recommend retaining him for tough and cost-effective litigation advocacy.
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.