martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Daniel J. O'Hanlon Document Search Results (10) Sort by:  | Construction of Enormous House on Hillside is “Unusual Circumstances” Not Entitled to Infill Exemption from CEQA
Jon E. Goetz, Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article March 15, 2012, previously published on March 13, 2012 A Court of Appeal recently held that a city erred in finding a categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) for a project involving the construction of a 9,872 square foot single-family dwelling on a lot with alleged geotechnical issues. (Berkeley...
| | County’s Error In Failing To Provide CEQA Notice To Public Agency Was Not Prejudicial
Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article October 31, 2011, previously published on October 25, 2011 In Schenck v. County of Sonoma (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 1 Dist., August 26, 2011), a court of appeal considered whether a county’s failure to give proper notice to a public agency constituted lack of compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”)...
| | City Properly Balanced Benefits Of Hospital Project Against Its Adverse Impacts On Neighboring Residents
Jon E. Goetz, Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article September 16, 2011, previously published on September 8, 2011 In Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment v. City of Santa Clarita (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 2 Dist., June 30, 2011), a court of appeal considered whether (1) a city’s conclusion on the infeasibility of complete mitigation of a hospital project’s impact on climate...
| | District Court Rejects Claims to Area of Origin Priority by Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Daniel J. O'Hanlon, Hanspeter Walter; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article August 5, 2011, previously published on August 3, 2011 Water users in the Sacramento Valley have no preferential right to delivery of Central Valley Project (“CVP”) water under the state’s so-called “area of origin” laws, according to the U.S. District Court in Fresno. The “area of origin” laws allow water...
| | UPDATE: Supreme Court Relaxes Standing Requirement For Corporations In CEQA Cases But Finds No EIR Is Required For Ordinance That Bans Use Of Plastic Shopping Bags
Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon, Eric N. Robinson; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article July 26, 2011, previously published on July 22, 2011 In Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach, (--- P.3d ----, Cal., July 14, 2011), the California Supreme Court considered (1) whether corporations are subject to a different standing requirement when challenging determinations regarding the necessity of preparing an environmental...
| | CEQA Does Not Work In Reverse To Require Environmental Impact Report Where The Environment Will Have An Effect On A Project
Jon E. Goetz, Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article July 26, 2011, previously published on July 25, 2011 In South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. City of Dana Point, (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 4 Dist., June 30, 2011), a court of appeal considered whether the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) works in reverse to require an environmental impact report...
| | Local Government's Decision To Prepare An EIR Does Not Preclude It From Later Invoking A CEQA Exemption
Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article July 22, 2011, previously published on July 20, 2011 In Del Cerro Mobile Estates v. City of Placentia, (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 4 Dist., June 7, 2011), a court of appeal considered the issue of whether a city was precluded from invoking an exemption provided for in the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) because the city...
| | City’s Revised Environmental Impact Report On Seismic Impacts Met CEQA Requirements
Jon E. Goetz, Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article July 13, 2011, previously published on July 5, 2011 In Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland and Oakland Harbor Partners et al., (195 Cal.App.4th 884, Cal.App. 1 Dist., May 19, 2011), a court of appeal considered whether a city’s treatment of seismic impacts met the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act...
| | Environmental Group Failed To Exhaust its Administrative Remedies Before Bringing Suit Against City of San Diego
Jon E. Goetz, Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article July 12, 2011, previously published on June 29, 2011 In Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. City of San Diego, (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 4 Dist., May 19, 2011), a court of appeal considered whether (1) the city followed the proper procedure under the water code and CEQA in adopting a water supply assessment, and (2)...
| | Value Of Emission Reduction Credits Could Be Included In The Assessment Of Power Plant For Property Tax Purposes
Jeffrey L. Massey, Daniel J. O'Hanlon, Brett L. Price; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard A Law Corporation;
Legal Alert/Article June 10, 2011, previously published on June 8, 2011 In Elk Hills Power, LLC v. Board of Equalization, (--- Cal.Rptr.3d ----, Cal.App. 4 Dist., May 10, 2011), a court of appeal considered whether the California State Board of Equalization (“Board”) properly assessed the value of an electric power plant for taxation purposes where it...
|
|