Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Law Firm Profile > People > Lawyer Profile

Daniel Scott Leventhal

  - Lawyer Profile
 



Daniel Scott Leventhal

Daniel Scott Leventhal

Associate
 
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
1301 McKinney, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas  77010-3095
(Ft. Bend, Harris & Montgomery Cos.)

Telephone: 713-651-5151
Fax: 713-651-5246
http://www.fulbright.com


Profile Visibility
#84 in weekly profile views out of 14,455 lawyers in Houston, Texas
#5,239 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall


Experience & Credentials
 


Practice AreasPatent Litigation(75%); Intellectual Property(25%)
 
EducationUniversity of Texas at Austin, J.D., with honors, 2005, University of Texas at Austin, B.S., Electrical Engineering, high honors, 2002
 
Admitted2005, Texas; 2006, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas; 2007, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas; registered to practice before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
 
MembershipsHouston and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Texas; Houston Volunteer Lawyers Program; Houston Young Lawyers Association; Houston Intellectual Property Association; American Intellectual Property Law Association; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
 
BornPittsburgh, Pennyslvania
 
BiographyChancellors Society; Order of the Coif. Member, Texas Law Review. Co-Author, "FTC Finds Rambus Unlawfully Obtained Monopoly Power as Part of Involvement in a Standard-Setting Body and Violation of its IPR Policy," (with Richard Zembek and Carlos Rainer) Fulbright Client Alert, August 2006. Speaker, "Intellectual Property for Engineers," University of Texas at Austin, Electrical Engineering Department, Spring 2006, Fall 2006.
 
ISLN918631969
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com


En Banc Federal Circuit Holds, 'Section 271(f) Does Not Cover Method Claims'
Daniel Scott Leventhal, August 24, 2009
On August 19, 2009, an en banc panel of the Federal Circuit held that Section 271(f) of the Patent Act (35 U.S.C. § 271(f)) does not cover method claims. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Med., Inc., No. 2007-1296, slip op. at 17 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 19, 2009). In doing so, the Federal Circuit...

Tafas v. Doll: Federal Circuit Reverses Injunction on PTO Implementation of RCE and Claim Limitation Rules
John E. Schneider, Daniel Scott Leventhal, April 8, 2009
On March 20, 2009, the Federal Circuit, in a split decision, reversed in part the April 2008 decision of the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia enjoining the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") from implementing a set of rules limiting the number of continuations,...


 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this lawyer? Share your experience as a Client of this lawyer and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only


Quickly and easily expand your professional network – join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the Martindale-Hubbell database – over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now
 


 

Compare this Lawyer

Compare this lawyer to other lawyers in your Watch List.
 

Add lawyer to My Watch List

As a registered user of martindale.com you can add lawyers to your Watch List. You can securely add comments, compare lawyers in your Watch List, and access these lawyers with one click from your martindale.com homepage.