- Class Action
- Mediation & Alternative Dispute Resolution
- IP Litigation
- Wireless Communications
- Privacy & Security
- Communications & Media
- Retail & Consumer Products
|Contact Info||Telephone: 415.432.6109|
Internet: Each Attorney's Internet Address takes the following form: first initial, last name @mintz.com (e.g., email@example.com)
|University ||Fordham University, B.A., 1990|
|Law School||Pepperdine University, J.D., 1993|
|Admitted||1993, California; U.S. Supreme Court; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; U.S. District Court for the Southern, Northern, Central and Eastern Districts of California|
Professional & Community Involvement
•Member, Federal Bar Association
•Member, Federal Communications Bar Association
•Member, California Bar Association,
•Member, San Diego Bar Association
•fellow, Litigation Counsel of America
•Past board member, Volunteers of America Southwest California Corporation
Daniel's practice is focused on complex business litigation, international and domestic arbitration, intellectual property litigation, class action defense, unfair competition, and telecommunications. He is an experienced trial lawyer and clients often call upon him for complex and challenging cases with stakes that require a winning strategy. He has tried to verdict or award over 40 cases, including jury trials, bench trials, and arbitrations.
Daniel has extensive experience using a strong litigation strategy to secure favorable settlements for his clients. For example, he has served as lead defense counsel on over 70 alleged nationwide class actions, representing a variety of clients from Fortune 100 companies to smaller businesses in a diverse variety of industries, such as telecommunications carriers, technology manufacturers, retail department stores, investment providers, banks, an international cruise line, and insurance companies.
While the aggregate alleged exposure to his clients in class actions amounted to billions of dollars, no class has ever been certified over his objection, none of his class action clients has ever suffered an adverse judgment, and he has secured favorable settlements (often for no payment of cash or payment of minimal nuisance value) for his clients in all class actions he has defended.
Daniel is well-versed in using alternative dispute resolution procedures, like mediation and arbitration, and has successfully handled dozens of complex international and domestic arbitrations. He also has considerable appellate experience, having argued groundbreaking cases to both state and federal appellate courts, including serving as lead counsel on a precedential appeal before an en banc panel of the US Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
Prior to joining the firm, Daniel was the head of the San Diego office and California litigation practice of a national law firm.
Recognitions & Awards
•San Diego Super Lawyers: Intellectual Property Litigation, Business Litigation (2007 - 2009, 2013 - 2015)
• Fourteen Mintz Levin Members Named 2015 Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars, (01.23.2015)
• Eleven Mintz Levin Members Named Southern California Super Lawyers, (01.17.2014)
• Nine Mintz Levin Members Named San Diego Super Lawyers, (06.10.2013)
• Five Mintz Levin Members Named San Diego Super Lawyers, (06.11.2008)
• Four Mintz Levin Members Named San Diego Super Lawyers, (06.01.2007)
• Mintz Levin Continues San Diego and Palo Alto Growth with Major Additions Including Former Partners from Sonnenschein and Buchanan Ingersoll, (04.03.2007)
•Co-author, The Future of Class Action Suits After Wal-Mart v. Dukes, Class Action Alert (06.23.2011)
•Co-author, U.S. Supreme Court Overturns California Rule that Prohibited Waivers of Class Action Relief in Arbitration Agreements, Class Action Alert (04.28.2011)
•Co-author, CA Supreme Court Prohibits Zip Code Requests in Credit Card Transactions, Litigation Alert (03.17.2011)
Dan Pascucci talks about the Supreme Court's role in establishing the national identity of class action litigation.
• Speaker, April MCLE: The Fine Print Matters - Boilerplate Contract Clauses Through the Litigator's Lens, ACC America, San Diego, CA (04.17.2014)
• Speaker, Litigate or Arbitrate? The Various Paths to Resolution for Patent Infringement, Commercial, and Trade Secret / Non-Compete Lawsuits, Litigate or Arbitrate?, Mintz Levin, San Diego, CA (01.25.2011) (Also at San Diego Office)
|Reported Cases||Representative Matters: Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego, et al. , 543 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. en banc 2007); Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego, et al. , 490 F.3d 700 (9th Cir. 2007); Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego , 377 F.Supp.2d 886 (S.D. Cal. 2005); Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego , 311 F.Supp.2d 898 (S.D. Cal. 2004); von Grabe v. Sprint PCS , 312 F.Supp.2d 1285 (S.D. Cal. 2003); Cox Communications PCS, L.P. v. City of San Marcos , 204 F.Supp.2d 1272 (S.D. Cal. 2002); Cox Communications PCS, L.P. v. City of San Marcos , 204 F.Supp.2d 1260 (S.D. Cal. 2002); Ball v. GTE Mobilnet of California, et al. 81 Cal. App. 4th 529 (2000)|
|Profile Visibility |
|#1,100 in weekly profile views out of 21,991 lawyers in San Francisco, California|
|#104,626 in weekly profile views out of 1,711,087 total lawyers Overall|