- Management Labor Law
- Management Employment Law
- College and University Law
Colgate University, B.A., cum laude, 1982
Duke University, J.D., 1985
1985, Maryland, Court Appeals of Maryland; 1986, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland; 1990, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 1991, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit; 1996, U.S. Court of International Trade; 1998, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, U.S. Supreme Court; 2002, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
The Bar Association of Baltimore City; Maryland State and American (Member, Labor and Employment Law Section) Bar Associations; National Association of College and University Attorneys.
Bethpage, New York, April 24, 1960
Adjunct Professor, University of Baltimore School of Law, 1986—. Author: "Matthew Bender's Employment Discrimination Expediter"; "Family and Medical Leave Act," 7 Labor & Employment Law, Lexis/Nexis (2003). Co-Author: "Non-Discrimination," with N.P. Lareau, Drafting the Union Contract, 5A, Matthew-Bender (1993). Member, Editorial Board, Matthew Bender's Labor and Employment Bulletin.
Peeples v. Coastal Office Products, Inc., 203 F. Supp. 2d 432 (D. Md. 2002), aff'd, 64 Fed. Appx. 860 (4th Cir. 2003); Soth v. The Baltimore Sunpapers, 4 F.Supp. 2d 417 (D. Md. 1996); aff'd, 145 F.3d 1325 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 795 (1999), Elliott v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, 104 Md. App. 93 (1995); Raley v. Board of County Commissioners, 752 F.Supp. 1272 (D. Md. 1990).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com