Lexis Nexis
 |    |  
Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Home > Law Firm Profile > People > Lawyer Profile

David B. Franklin

  - Lawyer Profile
 



David B. Franklin

Partner
 
Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP
121 Spear Street, Suite 200
San Francisco, California  94105
(San Francisco Co.)

Telephone: 415-356-4600
Fax: 415-356-4610
http://www.luce.com

Email: Contact via email

Visibility Rankings
#325 out of 13,257 lawyers in San Francisco, California
#22,085 out of 898,912 total lawyers Overall


Experience & Credentials
 


Practice AreasReal Estate; Finance; Land Use
 
EducationDuke University, J.D., 1975, Stanford University, A.B., 1972
 
Admitted1975, California and U.S. District Court, Southern District of California; 1976, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California; 1978, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit; 1984, Hawaii and U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii; 1996, U.S. Supreme Court
 
MembershipsBar Association of San Francisco (Member, Sections on: Business Law; Real Property); State Bar of California (Member, Sections on: Business Law; Real Property Law; Environmental Law); Hawaii State Bar Association; American Bar Association (Member, Sections on: Business Law; Real Property Law; Environmental Law).
 
BornLincoln, Nebraska, March 7, 1950
 
BiographyPhi Beta Kappa; Phi Alpha Delta.
 
Reported CasesNeogard Corporation v. Malott & Peterson-Grundy 106 Cal. App. 3d. 213 (1980).
 
ISLN907294427
 
TransactionsSite acquisition and development in California and Hawaii for national big-box retailer, since 1986.
 

Articles by this firm on Martindale.com


Court Rules an Entitlements Contingency Renders Land Contract Unenforceable
Joseph S. Stuart, Robert D. Buell, David B. Franklin, George C. Rudolph, Benjamin Allan Hirasawa, July 10, 2008
In the recent case of Steiner v. Thexton (May 2008), the California Court of Appeal ruled that a particular purchase agreement containing a discretionary, unilateral "entitlements" contingency, is void.

Court Decides Whether Specific Performance Remedy Is Available for Commercial Real Estate
Joseph S. Stuart, George C. Rudolph, Kenneth J. Stipanov, Robert D. Buell, David B. Franklin, June 4, 2008
In a recent case, Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. Vallas, the trial court ruled that a breaching seller could not be forced to consummate a sale of a commercial property because the property was like a "widget" and that such commercial/investment property is not unique enough to garner the...


 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this lawyer? Share your experience as a Client of this lawyer and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 

 

Professional Networking for Lawyers Only


Quickly and easily expand your professional network – join the premier global network for lawyers only. It's powered by the Martindale-Hubbell database – over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now

Add lawyer to My Watch List

As a registered user of martindale.com you can add lawyers to your Watch List. You can securely add comments, compare lawyers in your Watch List, and access these lawyers with one click from your martindale.com homepage.

 

Compare this Lawyer

Compare this lawyer to other lawyers in your Watch List.








Total Practice Solutions

 
Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.