| Biography | David Perry focuses his practice on patent litigation. He has extensive experience litigating patent disputes in federal court and the International Trade Commission. Mr. Perry has represented companies in a diverse range of technologies, including semiconductor processing technology, semiconductor packaging, cellular telephones, high-speed modems, DRAM memory chips and portable media players. He has also counseled clients on patent issues involving technologies related to personal computers, cellular communications, copiers and global positioning systems. Experience Worked on teams handling the following matters: Flexsys Americas LP v. Kumho Tire U.S.A. Inc. et al., Successfully defend follow-on damages patent infringement action against Korean petrochemical concern by defeating claims on summary judgment.
Flexsys Americas LP v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc. et al., No. 5:05-CV-00156 (N.D. Ohio filed Jan. 28, 2005). Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc., et al., Defended Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. in its long-standing battle against Rambus in dispute involving DRAM patents and alleged spoliation of evidence.
Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. et al., No. 5:05-cv-00334 (N.D. Cal. filed Jan. 25, 2005). In re Certain Wireless Communications Equipment, Articles Therein, and Products Containing the Same, Represented Samsung Electronics in its assertion and defense of patents related to cellular telecommunications, including signal conversion and coding.
In re Certain Wireless Communications Equipment, Articles Therein, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. Nos. 337-TA-577, 337-TA-583. Tessera Inc. v. Micron Technology Inc. et al., Defended Infineon Technologies against antitrust claims and assertion of patents related to DRAM packaging. (Judge Love).
Tessera Inc. v. Micron Technology Inc. et al., No. 2:05-cv-00094 (E.D. Tex. filed Mar. 1, 2005). Ring Technology v. Add-On Computer, et al., Representing Wintec and EdgeTech, computer storage device manufacturers, in defense of a patent infringement action related to computer memory technology. Case pending. (Judge Ward).
Ring Tech. Enters. of Tex., LLC v. Add-On Computer Peripherals, LLC, No. 2:10-cv-00104-TJW (E.D. Tex. filed Mar. 24, 2010). Townshend Intellectual Property LLC v. Agere Systems Inc., Defended Agere Systems, Inc. against patent assertion by Brent Townshend, alleged inventor of the 56K modem.
Townshend Intellectual Property LLC v. Agere Systems Inc., No. 5:02-cv-04836 (N.D. Cal. filed Oct. 7, 2002). Infineon Technologies v. Mosaid Technologies, et al., Defended Infineon Technologies against Mosaid Technologies assertion of its crown jewel patents relating to DRAM circuit design.
Infineon Technologies v. Mosaid Technologies, et al., No. 2:03-cv-04698 (D.N.J. filed Oct. 2, 2003). In re Certain Portable Digital Media Players, Defended Apple Computer, Inc. against assertion of patent allegedly covering all iPods.
In re Certain Portable Digital Media Players, Inv. No. 337-TA-573. *Experience gained by attorney prior to joining Kilpatrick Townsend |