- Land Use Law
- Zoning Law
- Eminent Domain Law
Princeton University, A.B., 1980
University of Southern California, J.D., 1983
Planning and Zoning Commissions, Coastal Commission.
Guest Lecturer, Real Estate Finance, USC Law School. Member, Planning Committee, USC Law Symposium on Real Estate Law and Business, 2008. Member, Condemnation and Land Valuation Committee, Los Angeles County Bar Association. Commissioner, Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation (JNE), State Bar of California, 1997-2000. Member: Committee of Bar Examiners 2002-2006, Chair (2005-2006); Judicial Council Court Facilities Transitional Task Force 2004-2007. Attorney Civility Task Force, State Bar of California, 2006-2007.
Southern California Rapid Transit Dist. v. Bolen (1992) 1 Cal. 4th 654; Manhattan Beach v. Superior Court (Farquhar) (1996) 13 Cal. 4th 232; City of Vista v. W. O. Fielder, et al. (1996) 13 Cal. 4th 612; City of Malibu v. California Coastal Comn. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 897; Alameda Belt Line v. City of Alameda (2003) 113 CAl.App.4th 15; CUNA Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Los Angeles County MTA (2003) 108 Cal. App. 4th 382; Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hawthorne v. Force Electronics (1997) 55 Cal. App. 4th 622; Los Angeles Unified School District v. Trump Wilshire Associates (1996) 42 Cal. App. 4th 1682; Kalmanovitz v. Bitting (1996) 43 Cal. App. 4th 311; Friends of La Vina v. County of Los Angeles (1991) 232 Cal. App. 3d. 1446; Thomas v. County of Los Angeles (1991) 232 Cal. App. 3d 1446; Smith v. County of Los Angeles (1989) 211 Cal. App. 3d 188; Surfside Colony Ltd. v. Cal. Coastal Comm. (1991) 226 Cal. App. 3d 1260.
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com