|
Profile Visibility  | | #604 in weekly profile views out of 4,217 lawyers in Kansas City, Missouri | | #19,815 in weekly profile views out of 968,939 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Labor and Employment | | | Education | Duke University, J.D., with high honors, 1989, Dartmouth College, B.A., cum laude, with high honors, 1986 | | | Admitted | 1989, Pennsylvania; 1990, District of Columbia; 1998, Missouri; 2001, Kansas | |
| Memberships | Kansas City Metropolitan and Kansas Bar Associations; The Missouri Bar; District of Columbia Bar; Society for Human Resources Management. | | | Biography | Co-author: "Using Compulsory Arbitration to Resolve EEO Disputes," N.Y.L.J., 1992; "Employee Eligibility for FMLA Leave: When Do Twelve Months Mean Twelve Months, and Other Mysterious Issues," SHRM White Paper, 2003, updated 2006. | | | ISLN | 906181537 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
New Legislation Expands FMLA Military Leave
Michaelle L. Baumert, Paul Burmeister, Philip Bradford Byrum, Kate M. Heideman, Deena B. Jenab, Paul F. Pautler, Gerard K. Rodriguez, Paul D. Satterwhite, Mary Hurley Stuart, November 11, 2009 On October 28, 2009, President Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (FY 2010 NDAA). The new law amends the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provisions applicable to military personnel and their families by expanding the availability of both qualifying...
Court Limits Enforcement of Non-Union Email PolicyPhilip Bradford Byrum, Mary Hurley Stuart, Deena B. Jenab, Paul F. Pautler, Michaelle L. Baumert, Paul Burmeister, Paul D. Satterwhite, Bradley S. Hiles, Terry L. Potter, August 4, 2009 On July 7, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit determined that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act by inconsistently enforcing an email use policy against union communications.
Supreme Court Adopts "But For" Rule for ADEA CasesPhilip Bradford Byrum, Mary Hurley Stuart, Deena B. Jenab, Paul F. Pautler, Michaelle L. Baumert, Paul Burmeister, Paul D. Satterwhite, Bradley S. Hiles, Gerard K. Rodriguez, July 1, 2009 On June 18, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that plaintiffs claiming disparate-treatment discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) must prove that their age was "the reason" the employer took adverse action against them. Gross v. FBL... |
|
|