|
 | Douglas B. MishkinPartner
Patton Boggs LLP 2550 M Street, N.W. Washington, District of Columbia
20037-1350
Telephone: 202-457-6000 Telecopier: 202-457-6315 http://www.pattonboggs.com/dmishkin
|
Profile Visibility  | | #648 in weekly profile views out of 24,595 lawyers in Washington, District of Columbia | | #21,731 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Employment Law; Litigation | | | Education | George Washington University, J.D., 1980, Brown University, B.A., 1977 | | | Admitted | 1980, District of Columbia; 1982, Maryland; 1994, Virginia | |
| Memberships | The District of Columbia Bar; Virginia State Bar, Maryland State Bar. | | | Born | Queens, New York, 1954 | | | Biography | Recipient: Burton Award for Legal Achievement in Writing, 2005; Pro Bono Partner of the Year Award, 2005. Clerk to Hon. Peter H. Wolf, Superior Court of the District of Columbia, 1980-1981. Member, Ethics Committee of George Washington University Medical Center, 1987—. Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Health Care Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1991—. Faculty Member: Georgetown University Law Center's GULC/NITA Intensive Session in Trial Advocacy Skills, 2001-2004; Georgetown University Law Center's GULC/NITA Depositions Seminar, 2002; Advanced Legal System Institute, Biomedical and Biotechnology Education. Legal Editor: Society for Human Resource Management Learning System; Workplace Flexibility 2010 Legal Working Group. Board Member, Legalink, a worldwide network of law firms. Member, President Clinton Transition Team, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. | | | ISLN | 902457452 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
The Supreme Court's Ruling in the Firefighter Case: So What?Douglas B. Mishkin, Pamela S. Richardson, July 10, 2009 On June 29, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that the City of New Haven violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it discarded the results of a written examination for promotion of firefighters because only white and Hispanic firefighters would have been promoted according to... |
|
|