Douglas Behr joined Keller and Heckman in 1994. He practices civil litigation and white collar criminal defense. He handles matters regulated by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Mr. Behr represents business, trade associations, and individuals before federal and state trial and appellate courts, regulatory bodies, and licensing forums with a concentration on Lanham Act false advertising, contract disputes, white collar crime defense, product liability, and trade regulation controversies. He also advises members of the business community on litigation avoidance, and works with health care professionals and others on matters regulated by the Drug Enforcement Administration. Prior to entering private practice, Mr. Behr served 12 years as an Assistant United States Attorney, primarily as a prosecutor, and received a special achievement award from the Justice Department. He is a faculty member of the National Institute of Trial Advocacy.
Mr. Behr is a contributing author of Beyond Telecom Law Blog.
Memberships
ABA White Collar Crime Section; Federal American Inn of Court
News, Events & Articles
News
Dec 08, 2011, The California Appellate Court Affirms Tokyo Electron Limited Victory
Sep 07, 2011, The Privacy Playbook: A Practical Guide for Businesses Slides Are Now Available For Download!
May 09, 2011, Keller and Heckman Partners Discuss Beyond Telecom Law Blog in This Week's Telecom Video Minute
Jan 28, 2011, Daily Journal Names Tokyo Electron Ltd. Victory Top Defense Verdict of 2010
Jul 13, 2010, Keller and Heckman's Pro Bono Program Obtains Political Asylum for Victims of Gang Violence
Mar 02, 2010, Keller and Heckman Secures Complete Victory for Tokyo Electron Limited after Eight-Year Legal Battle
Mar 02, 2010, Keller and Heckman LLP Secures Complete Victory for Tokyo Electron Limited after Eight-Year Legal Battle
Events
Jul 28, 2011, Register Today! The Privacy Playbook: A Practical Guide for Businesses
Articles
Aug 26, 2011, New York Court Dismisses Advertisers from "Flash Cookie" Lawsuit; Narrows State Claims Against Ad Technology Provider
Feb 01, 2011, Litigation Alert: Eighth Circuit Finds Adulterated Drug Claims Are Not Preempted
Aug 06, 2010, Nanotechnology Defined
Jul 26, 2010, Client Alert: The Attorney-Client Privilege and Former Employees
Jun 28, 2010, Litigation Alert: Seventh Circuit Holds that Federal Jurisdiction under CAFA is Determined Exclusively At the Time of Removal
Jun 23, 2010, IP, Telecom and Technology Sourcing Bulletin
Jun 18, 2010, Litigation Alert: Court Explains the Circumstances in Which an Employer May Invoke the Attorney-Client Privilege When Communications are Neither Authored By Nor Addressed To Counsel
Sep 17, 2009, IP, Telecom and Technology Sourcing Bulletin
Sep 11, 2009, Litigation Alert: No Business Dealings in US? You Can End Up in US Federal Courts
Jul 22, 2009, IP, Telecom and Technology Sourcing Bulletin
Jul 08, 2009, Litigation Alert: Arbitrators May Order the Loser to Pay Attorney's and Arbitrator's Fees Upon a Finding of Bad Faith Even When the Contract Invokes The American Rule
Jun 15, 2009, Litigation Alert: California Court of Appeal Holds That a Foreign Manufacturer Can Be Sued in California By Serving Process on an American Subsidiary
Jun 08, 2009, Litigation Alert: FEMA and Formaldehyde Exposure: Federal Law Preempts State Tort And Failure To Warn Claims
May 01, 2009, The New Import Declaration Requirement for Plants and Plant Products Under the Lacey Act
Dec 19, 2008, Supreme Court's Environmental Agenda
Apr 12, 2007, Association News Alert
Dec 01, 2005, False Claims of FDA Approval Are Actionable Under the Lanham Act
Oct 15, 2003, DEA Establishes a Zero Threshold for Gamma Butyrolactone (GBL)
Sep 22, 2003, Negotiating Telecommunications User Deals: Structuring Arbitration Clauses & Resolving Disputes
Nov 14, 2002, Louisiana Supreme Court Rules that Punitive Damages are not Available in Toxic Tort Conspiracies
Dec 18, 2001, DEA Proposes Exemption for Large Transactions in Gamma Butyrolactone (GBL)
Jul 02, 2001, Federal Regulations Affecting Gamma Butyrolactone (GBL)
Aug 11, 1998, Medical Device/Component Liability and Tort Reform
Jul 10, 1998, Supreme Court Clarifies Test for Parent Corporation Liability under Superfund