martindale.com®
Premier Destination for Sophisticated Buyers of Legal Services
Our site is transforming - feedback needed!
Home > Quarles & Brady LLP > People > Lawyer Profile

E. King Poor

  - Lawyer Profile
 



E. King Poor: Lawyer with Quarles & Brady LLP

E. King Poor

Partner
 
Quarles & Brady LLP
300 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 4000
Chicago, Illinois  60654
(Cook Co.)

Telephone: (312) 715-5143
Fax: (312) 632-1743
http://www.quarles.com



Profile Visibility
#3,067 in weekly profile views out of 25,750 lawyers in Chicago, Illinois
#113,845 in weekly profile views out of 968,565 total lawyers Overall
Featured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer IconFeatured AV Peer Review Rated Lawyer Icon


Experience & Credentials Client/Peer Review Ratings™
 


Practice AreasLitigation; Appellate
 
EducationEmory University, J.D., 1979, Dartmouth College, A.B., cum laude, with high distinction, 1976
 
Admitted1980, Illinois
 
MembershipsAppellate Lawyers Association.
 
BornFlint, Michigan, February 8, 1954
 
BiographyInstructor, National Institute of Trial Advocacy. Author: "The Jurisdictional Time Limit for an Appeal: The Worst Kind of Deadline-Except for All Others," 102 Northwestern L. Rev. Colloquy 151 (2008); "Jurisdictional Deadlines in the Wake of Kontrick and Eberhart: Harmonizing 160 Years of Precedent," 40 Creighton L. Rev. 181 (2007); "Utility Rates Pending Judicial Review: A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery in Illinois," 17 John Marshall L. Rev. 743 (1984). Assistant Illinois Attorney General, Illinois Commerce Commission Division, 1980-1984. Member, Leading Lawyers Network.
 
ISLN904365861
 

Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com


Ashcroft v. Iqbal: The Twombly Sequel -- No "Threadbare Recitals" In Federal Complaints
E. King Poor, Valerie P. Vidal, June 26, 2009
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), which many saw as a major shift in the standard for what must be alleged in complaints for federal court. In Twombly, the Court required a higher standard of pleading in an antitrust case,...

Dissolving What's Been Merged: Judicial Dissolution Claim Survives Merger
E. King Poor, Freya K. Bowen, June 15, 2009
Last month, in a case of first impression, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a former minority shareholder could still seek a judicial dissolution - even after he ceased to be a shareholder when the corporation had been merged.


View Client/Peer Review Ratings
 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this lawyer? Share your experience as a Client of this lawyer and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
Learn more
 

Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only


Quickly and easily expand your professional network – join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the Martindale-Hubbell database – over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Learn more
Join Now
 


 

Compare this Lawyer

Compare this lawyer to other lawyers in your Watch List.
 

Add lawyer to My Watch List

As a registered user of martindale.com you can add lawyers to your Watch List. You can securely add comments, compare lawyers in your Watch List, and access these lawyers with one click from your martindale.com homepage.
Learn More




Lawyers.com | LawyerLocator.co.uk | Anwalt24.de | martindale.co.il | martindale.jp | lexiscnweb.com | law24.co.za | global.lexisnexis.com
Total Practice Solutions

 

About LexisNexis | About Martindale-Hubbell | Law Firms | Lawyers | RSS RSS | Blog | Advertising Opportunities | Site Map | Contact Us
Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Copyright 2009 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.