EDWARD SEGLIAS is the Vice President of Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC as well as a Shareholder and a member of the Board of Directors. He is also the Managing Partner of the Firm's Delaware office and a Partner in the Firm's Construction Group.
Ed concentrates his practice in construction law and commercial litigation and has successfully tried numerous construction and commercial cases in the mid-Atlantic region. He has obtained many verdicts over one million dollars and also has successfully defended clients against numerous multi-million dollar claims.
Ed has authored numerous articles relating to the construction industry. He is also a highly sought-after lecturer on the subjects of bidding law, delay claims, scope claims and project management. Seminars he has created for various trade organizations include: Construction Project Documentation: Improving Your Chances For Victory and The Steel Crisis: Where Are We and What Can Be Done About It?, which were presented to the Associated Builders and Contractors of Delaware, the Delaware Contractors Association and the Southeast chapter of the Mechanical Contractors Association, Blame, Claims and Time Frames: How To Better Manage Risk and Reward on Construction Projects, given to the Mechanical Contractors Association and the Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, and Trying the Construction Jury Trial, presented at the Construction Law Session of the ABA section on Litigation.
During his spare time, Ed enjoys golf, squash and cycling.
News & Publications
•Q&A with Our D.C. Team
Construction in Brief: 2015 Volume 3
•Cohen Seglias Merges With Thaler Liebeler Amid DC Launch
Law360 - June 15, 2015
•Cohen Seglias Adds D.C. Presence Through Merger
The Legal Intelligencer - June 15, 2015
•Construction Law Firm Expands into Washington
The Philadelphia Business Journal - June 15, 2015
•Cohen Seglias Ranked in Chambers USA
Client Alert - May 21, 2015
•New Permitting and Licensure Requirements Take Effect in Philadelphia
Client Alert - January 10, 2014
•Q&A with Our Partners
Construction in Brief: 2013 Volume 4
•Backcharges Assessed Against Subcontractors Can Invalidate Lower-Tier Bond Claims
Construction in Brief: 2013 Volume 2
•Cohen Seglias Attorneys Named 2013 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
May 17, 2013
•Conway - Good News for Homeowners and Bad News for Builders
Construction in Brief: 2013 Volume 1
•Law firm mergers kept up pace in 2012
Philadelphia Inquirer - January 8, 2013
•Construction-focused law firm to acquire a New York office in merger
Philadelphia Business Journal - December 6, 2012
•Bidder Beware: Recent Pennsylvania Case Provides Cautionary Reminder of the Perils of Failing to Conform to Public Bid Specifications
Construction In Brief: Summer 2012
• Trials and Tribulations - A Roundtable Discussion
SmartCEO - June 2012
•Cohen Seglias Attorneys Named 2012 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
•Defects May Implode Las Vegas HotelProject
Business Insurance Magazine - November 13, 2011
•Cohen Seglias Attorneys Named Super Lawyers and Rising Stars
•Is Your Contract Making You an Accidental Tourist?
Construction In Brief: Spring 2011
•Cohen Seglias Attorneys Named to Super Lawyers List in Pennsylvania
June 4, 2010
•“Super Lawyers” From Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC
June 16, 2009
•Jury Returns $1.4 Million Verdict in Favor of CSPG&F Client
March 9, 2007
•NECA and SMACNA Seminar: Just Because You Are Right Doesn't Mean You Will Win
June 17, 2015 - Washington, DC
•MCA of Kentucky Presentation: Just Because You Are Right Doesn't Mean You Will Win
March 19, 2015 - Louisville, KY
•MCA Northeastern PA Presentation:Just Because You Are Right Doesn't Mean You Will Win
February 27, 2015
•Construction Super Conference: What WERE They Thinking? Critical Issues to Consider When Preparing and Litigating Before a Jury. Psychological and Practical Tips, and Strategies for Success
December 12, 2013 - San Francisco, CA
•Blames, Claims and Time Frames: What you need to know about protecting your rights on public work
January 22-25, 2013 - Aruba
•Comparative Construction Legal Concepts
September 14, 2011 - Baltimore, MD
•Litigating Complex Construction Claims in a Down Economy
December 11, 2008 - San Francisco, CA
•Indemnity Provisions and Additional Insured Endorsements: What to Know & What to Watch Out For (PDF)
November 14, 2008 - St David's, PA
•Managing Construction Risk In An Economically Volatile World - Techniques to Control Schedule, Cost & Liability (PDF)
October 30, 2008 - Columbia, MD
•Indemnity & Insurance... A Leap of Faith?
October 4, 2007 - Conshohocken, PA
•Upcoming Event: How Does the Law Change When Contractors Cross State Borders?
May 4, 2011
Ed has helped to establish important case law in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. For example, he was trial and appellate counsel in B. Pietrini & Sons, Inc. v. Agate Construction, Inc. 901 A. 2d 1050 (Pa. Super. 2006), a case which establishes law under the Pennsylvania Procurement Code that a contractor is entitled to the payment of attorney's fees and penalties when it has not been paid contract balance due and owing. In Pietrini, a general contractor withheld payment of undisputed contract balance and change orders because Pietrini refused to execute a final release of claims and liens, which would have waived its right to challenge Agate's refusal to pay certain disputed change orders. In a case of first impression, the Superior Court held that Agate acted in bad faith by withholding the undisputed balance as a means of gaining leverage against Pietrini to release the disputed change order claims.
In another case of first impression, Ed established law in the State of New Jersey holding that sureties issuing performance bonds on public projects cannot rely upon bond provisions that deviate from the bond form prescribed by statute. In Gloucester City Board of Education v. American Arbitration Association and Amwest Surety Insurance Company, 755 A. 2d 1256 (N.J. Super. 2000), Amwest sought to enforce certain provisions in the form bond it submitted, as defenses to the Board's performance bond claim. Amwest argued that the Board had failed to provide the requisite declaration of default and formal notice of termination as required by the provisions of the Amwest bond form submitted to Gloucester for the Project. The Superior Court reversed the trial court and rejected Amwest's argument on the grounds that surety bonds issued to satisfy the requirements of a statute will be construed consistently with the legislative mandate. Consequently, any provisions in the bond that are inconsistent with the statutory requirements must be stricken and substituted for those provisions of the statute that are required by law.
•Ed has been named to The 2015 edition of Chambers USA: Pennsylvania Construction list. Chambers USA ranks the leading firms and lawyers in an extensive range of practice areas throughout America. The research is in-depth and client focused and the guide is read by industry-leading companies and organizations throughout the US and worldwide.
•Ed has been named a Super Lawyer in the field of Construction Litigation every year since 2004 by Law and Politics Magazine. Law & Politics Magazine publishes Super Lawyers annually to recognize accomplished lawyers in more than 70 areas of practice. He was also named a Super Lawyer in the 2009 Corporate Counsel Edition for Construction Law.
•Ed has achieved an AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating for professional ethical standards and legal ability by Martindale-Hubbell. (Also at Wilmington, DE and Washington, District of Columbia Offices)