Practice Areas & Industries: Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP

 




Licensing, Collaborations, Joint Ventures & Strategic Alliances Return to Practice Areas & Industries

Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

Our Experience

Edwards Wildman advises business organizations as well as universities, medical centers and research institutions worldwide on a wide array of transactions involving licensing, collaborations, strategic alliances, software development, information technology, outsourcing and technology transfer, including

  • in-licensing and protection of core technology
  • out-licensing and commercialization of core and non-core technology
  • product development, manufacturing, supply and commercialization
  • technology and material transfer
  • clinical trials
  • research services
  • trademark and copyright licensing

Life Sciences

We are leaders in the life sciences industry. Our clients rely on our industry-specific and substantial depth of experience to efficiently structure and successfully complete complex transactions. The advantages our attorneys bring to our clients include:

  • relevant life sciences experience including biotech, pharmaceutical, medtech, diagnostics and healthcare.
  • experience drafting and negotiating licensing, collaboration, strategic alliance and joint venture arrangements.
  • cross-border experience.
  • experience drafting and interpreting institutional policies.
  • integrated cross-disciplinary teams with expertise in patent law, corporate and securities law, tax law, international law, and regulatory compliance.

Corporate Collaborations, Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances

Our commercial life science clients range from large multi-national pharmaceutical companies to emerging biotech start-ups. We advise our life sciences clients on a broad range of strategic transactions and issues relating to technology, licensing, corporate collaborations and strategic partnering arrangements including:

  • structuring and negotiating product development partnerships among pharmaceutical, biotech and medtech companies
  • implementing technology access strategies and agreements
  • accessing technologies from universities, research institutions and medical centers
  • navigating the IP landscape of leading edge technologies including genomics, proteomics, RNAi, monoclonal antibodies and pharmacogenomics
  • evaluating and resolving technology ownership disputes
  • performing transaction due diligence
  • advising on regulatory compliance and related issues

Commercial life sciences clients for whom we have negotiated license and collaboration agreements include:

  • Advanced Vision Research, Inc.
  • Bayer AG
  • EnVivo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Genzyme Corporation
  • Euroscreen SA
  • Jolife AB
  • Neovacs SA
  • Novartis BioVentures Ltd
  • Prosensa Therapeutics BV
  • Purdue Pharma
  • Santhera Pharmaceuticals Holding AG
  • Sekisui Diagnostics, LLC
  • Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  • Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • ViraCor-IBT Laboratories
  • WILEX Inc.

Institutional Licensing and Technology Transfer

We have extensive experience in technology transfer and intellectual property matters for universities, medical centers and research institutions. We regularly negotiate license agreements, sponsored research agreements, material transfer agreements, clinical trial agreements, consortium arrangements, consulting agreements between faculty members and commercial entities, and many other arrangements with academic research institutions and with governmental entities, both on behalf of such institutions or on behalf of commercial parties seeking to establish such arrangements.

As outside counsel to our institutional clients, we have drafted and advised on the interpretation of institutional polices dealing with intellectual property ownership and transfer, conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment. We have participated in the approval process of institutional policies, as well as institutional agreement templates to ensure compliance with applicable rules on conflicts. In so doing, our attorneys have served as members of medical center technology transfer committees as well as committees governing research conflicts of interest.

We are thoroughly familiar with the relevant U.S. Governmental statutes and regulations affecting technology transfer, including the Bayh-Dole Act and the National Institutes of Health regulations and policies. We are also familiar with Governmental and institutional policies governing research conflicts of interest.

In addition to our work on behalf of research institutions, we regularly represent companies in negotiations with research institutions for licenses, clinical trials, manufacturing and other forms of collaboration arrangements, so we understand the points of view of both the research organizations and of the commercial entities seeking to exploit the results of research. We are able to work quickly and efficiently in obtaining the broadest possible rights to technology from institutions, while ensuring such rights are consistent with the academic and legal regimes under which the institutions operate.

We are familiar with the most recent trends in collaborations between pharmaceutical companies and research institutions, and addressing the challenging issues they raise, including: the companies' desire to work side by side with institutional researchers, sometimes at the companies’ sites; and contractually mandated joint ownership of inventions arising from the collaboration.

Institutions for whom we have drafted policies and form agreements or otherwise negotiated licensing transactions include:

  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine of The Yeshiva University
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Boston Biomedical Research Institute
  • Dartmouth College
  • Fondation Leducq (France)
  • Georgetown University
  • Partners Healthcare
  • Immune Disease Institute
  • Massachusetts General Hospital 
  • Northeastern University
  • University of Bergen (Norway)
  • University of Florida
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University of South Florida
  • University of Vermont

Information Technology

Software
We advise developers of software and licensees of software in a wide variety licensing, software as a service (SaaS), and software hosting transactions, including for complex software, search engines, manufacturing software, financial software packages, and video game software, and advising clients on the use of open source software.

IT & Outsourcing
A properly structured, negotiated and documented IT or outsourcing transaction can generate substantial cost savings and non-financial benefits for business, including improved service quality and operations. Edwards Wildman guides clients through the legal issues associated with outsourcing emerging technologies and helps them leverage new opportunities. We have advised businesses in the US, Europe and Asia on numerous IT and outsourcing deals, including large, highly complex cross-border transactions involving information technology.

Both buyers and sellers seek our counsel, and our attorneys understand the issues on both sides of the table. We are experienced in negotiating electronic data interchange and integration agreements that enable clients to maintain the viability of their relationships with suppliers and customers seamlessly. Combined with our extensive industry knowledge, we are able to provide effective and efficient representation in every engagement.

Software and technology clients for whom we have negotiated license, collaboration, development, SaaS, ecommerce, colocation, or outsourcing agreements include:

Accertify
Cervalis LLC
Danaher
Delphi Technology, Inc.
Fortune Brands
General Mitchell International Airport (Milwaukee)
Goal.com S.A.
Groupon
GTECH
Hyatt Hotels
Hyundai Capital America
KIA Motors America
Orbitz Worldwide
Parametric Technologies Corporation
PatientsLikeMe, Inc.
RAND Worldwide, Inc.
Related Industries
Simcorp USA Inc.
The Mathworks, Inc.
WMS Gaming.

We negotiate licensing and cross-licensing deals to leverage intellectual property rights to maximize the value of a client’s core technology. Our experience includes deals involving semiconductors and chemical components used to produce them, specialty polymers and polymer-inorganic composites, fuel cell technology, and small molecules.


 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

Courts Weigh in on NSA Bulk Telephony Metadata Program
Lawrence R. Freedman,Ari Z. Moskowitz, January 07, 2014
In December, two federal courts weighed in on the NSA’s bulk telephony metadata collection program, under which the agency collects from U.S.-based telephone companies, and stores, the metadata of telephone calls - such as numbers dialed and received and the length of calls. The courts came...

SBA Issues Proposed Rule Permitting SBICs to Invest in Double Holding Companies
Christopher J. Douglass,Alan B. Roth,Michael R. Wilson, January 03, 2014
On December 23, 2013, the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) issued a proposed rule to revise the Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) regulations regarding investments in passive businesses and the use of double holding companies in structuring SBIC...

Conflict Minerals: Due Diligence and Disclosure Steps Public Companies Should be Addressing Now
Matthew C. Dallett,Ryan M. Rourke Reed, December 18, 2013
Public companies that manufacture products for which “conflict minerals” or their derivatives1 are necessary to the functionality or production should have concluded or be finalizing the “country of origin inquiries” required by the Securities and Exchange Commission...

Bills Introduced in Congress Addressing Online Video Distribution, Sports Blackouts
Seth A. Davidson,Arthur H. Harding, November 21, 2013
On Tuesday, November 12, 2013, Senator Rockefeller (D-WV), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, introduced the “Consumer Choice in Online Video Act” (CCOVA). Also on November 12, 2013, Senators Blumenthal (D-CT) and McCain (R-AZ) introduced the “Furthering Access and...

Who Owns a Bribe?
James Maton, November 15, 2013
A public official receives a bribe to award a contract. Does the bribe “belong” to the official or to the state that he or she represents? The answer to the question can matter a great deal to the success of a claim. But the issue is controversial and the answer unclear in English law....

Children’s Online And App-Based Games: Stakeholders Have until 21 November to Comment on the UK Regulator’s New Guidelines
Jonny McDonald,Akash Sachdeva, November 11, 2013
In April 2013 the UK Office of Fair Trading (the UK's consumer and competition regulator) (the “OFT”) launched an investigation into the way to police how children were being encouraged to make purchases whilst playing online and app-based games (particularly ‘in-game’...

OECD Reports Highlight that Belgium, New Zealand and Russia Need to Do More to Fight Bribery
Annie Clarke,Antonio Suarez-Martinez, October 24, 2013
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) last week released its latest reports on the anti-bribery measures in place in Belgium, Russia and New Zealand. The reports make recommendations on the implementation of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public...

UK Government Sounds the Horn for Incentivised Whistle-Blowing In the UK for Fraud, Bribery and Corruption
Neil Adams,Antonio Suarez-Martinez, October 18, 2013
The Home Office’s Organised and Serious Crime Strategy document, published on 7 October 2013 to coincide with the launch of the UK’s new National Crime Agency, made reference to the fact that the UK Government would be considering the case for incentivised whistle-blowing in instances...

London Court Decides Loan Agreement Bans LIBOR Manipulation
Rod J. Cowper, October 07, 2013
The Commercial Court in London has accepted that a term is to be implied into an agreement between a LIBOR reporting bank and its customer that it would not seek to manipulate LIBOR: Deutsche Bank AG v Unitech Global Ltd [2013] EWHC 2793 (Comm).

Employee Shareholders - UK Capital Gains Tax Exemption for Employee Shares
Shawn E. Atkinson,Michael McCormack,Andrew Overend,David Ramm, October 03, 2013
On 1 September 2013, the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 (the GIA) came into force in the UK bringing with it a new statutory employment status, namely the ‘employee shareholder’. The GIA provides that, through agreement with his employer and for no financial consideration (although...

Employer-Sponsored Health Plans and SEPT. 23 HIPAA DEADLINE: Time for a Tune Up?
Theodore P. Augustinos,Mark E. Schreiber,David S. Szabo, October 03, 2013
Self-insured employer health plans, whether administered by the sponsor or by a third party administrator (TPA), need to be in compliance with the amended HIPAA rules, effective September 23, 2013. That date has now passed and not all employers with self-insured plans are aware of their obligations...

SBIC Debentures Remain an Inexpensive Source of Capital Despite Pricing Increase
Kate L. Price,Alan B. Roth, September 24, 2013
The September 2013 pooling of Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) debentures was priced at 3.644%. This most recent semi-annual pricing of SBIC debentures reflected an increase to the March 2013 pricing of 2.351%, but it is still well below the historical average rate for SBIC...

UK Court of Appeal Invalidates Guarantee Because Not Signed By All Guarantors
Rod J. Cowper, August 17, 2013
If you take a guarantee from multiple guarantors, make sure they all sign up.

A New Player in Town: Domestic Anti-Bribery Enforcement by China
Kenneth Choy,John Yiu, August 07, 2013
Anti-corruption has in recent years consistently topped the list of hot topics in Asia, with the implementation of the UK’s Bribery Act and the perception of increasingly aggressive enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by the US. The focus to date, however, has largely been on the...

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms Lower Court Refusal to Enjoin Dish Network’s Advanced DVR and Ad-Skipping Services
Seth A. Davidson,Arthur H. Harding, August 02, 2013
A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has unanimously affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Central District of California denying Fox Broadcasting Co. a preliminary injunction against Dish Network’s advanced DVR service and its...

First Circuit Holds That Private Equity Fund is a Trade or Business Subject to Potential ERISA Control Group Liabilities; Broader Tax Consequences Possible
Lori A. Basilico,Benjamin Ferrucci,Karl P. Fryzel,Scott J. Pinarchick, July 31, 2013
Last week, reversing a decision of a federal district court in Massachusetts, the First Circuit held, in Sun Capital Partners III, LP et al. v New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension Fund et al., that a private equity fund qualified as a “trade or business” and may be...

SBA Modifies Procedures for the Prepayment of SBIC Pooled Debentures
Christopher J. Douglass,Alan B. Roth,Tamer Tullgren, July 30, 2013
On July 25, 2013, the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) issued a notice to Small Business Investment Companies (“SBICs”) that the procedures to prepay pooled debentures are being changed starting with the next semi-annual payment date on September 1, 2013.