|
Profile Visibility  | | #31 in weekly profile views out of 554 lawyers in Reston, Virginia | | #60,152 in weekly profile views out of 968,464 total lawyers Overall |
|
|
| |
| Practice Areas | Patents; Patent Litigation; Patent Prosecution; Patent Portfolio Management; Business Method Patents; Electrical Patents; Computer and Software Patents | | | Education | Washington & Lee University School of Law, J.D., cum laude, 1999, College of William & Mary, B.S., Computer Science, 1993 | | | Admitted | 1999, Virginia; 2000, District of Columbia | |
| Biography | Vice Chair, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Software and Business Patents Committee, 2009. | | | ISLN | 914319519 | |
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com
Ten Reasons the Supreme Court Should Take In re BilskiErika Harmon Arner, June 25, 2009, previously published by Patently-O Blog on April 1, 2009 The Time Has Come - Nearly thirty years have passed since the Supreme Court addressed patentable subject matter. The "BFD" cases-Gottschalk v. Benson (1972), Parker v. Flook (1978), and Diamond v. Diehr (1981)-represent modern doctrine on the scope of patentable processes under 35 U.S.C.... |
|
|