Printer Friendly VersionEmail this PageDownload to My Outlook ContactsAdd lawyer to My FavoritesCompare this lawyer to other lawyers in your favorites

Experience & Credentials

Practice Areas

  • Litigation
  • Intellectual Property & Technology Litigation
  • Class Action
  • Consumer Product Safety
  • Privacy & Security
  • Cybersecurity Risk Management
  • Employee Mobility
  • Noncompetes & Trade Secrets
  • E-Discovery & Records Management
  • Retail & Consumer Products
Contact InfoTelephone: 415.432.6016
Fax: 415-432-6001
University University of Pennsylvania, B.A.
Law SchoolNew York University, J.D.
AdmittedCalifornia; Florida; New York; United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; United States District Court for the Southern District of California; United States District Court for the Central District of California; United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; United States District Court for the Northern District of California; United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Professional & Community Involvement:
•Member, American Bar Association, Litigation Section and ABA Advisory Panel
•Member, International Trademark Association (INTA)
•Past Senior Article Editor, Annual Survey of American Law


Evan's complex litigation practice is focused on technology-related litigation and class actions involving intellectual property, commercial contract disputes, along with insurance, trade secret, unfair competition, and other Internet-related litigation.

Evan has spent more than a decade defending putative class actions in California and elsewhere, including consumer products, false advertising, and other product liability claims. The majority of these lawsuits involved claims under California's Unfair Competition Law, California's False Advertising Act, and California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act. He also has extensive experience in insurance coverage and contribution actions.


• Mintz Levin’s Evan Nadel to Speak at Bridgeport Class Action and Litigation Conference, (08.13.2013)
•quoted in Big Retailers May Regret Moving Tracking Suits to Federal Court, Law360 (04.03.2013)
•Featured in Mintz Levin Adds New Office Head, Class Action Atty in SF, Law360 (10.15.2012)
• Mintz Levin Names Paul Churchill to Head Growing San Francisco Office, (10.15.2012)
•Featured in Mintz Levin Tries New Recipe in the Bay Area, The Recorder (10.15.2012)


•Co-author, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Bows to U.S. Supreme Court on Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements, Class Action Alert (08.06.2013)
•Co-author, Recent Class Arbitration Decisions by Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and U.S. Supreme Court in Conflict, Class Action Alert (07.02.2013)
•Co-author, Delta Finds Reprieve in State Court, but Not Everyone Will Get to Fly the Friendly Skies, Privacy & Security Alert (06.03.2013)
•A Setback for Apple in Privacy MDL, Law360 (03.15.2013)
•Co-author, Ninth Circuit Clarifies Extraterritorial Reach of California Antitrust Laws, Antitrust Alert (02.25.2013)
•Co-author, Aryeh V. Canon: Impact on Calif.’s Unfair Competition Law, Law360 (02.15.2013)
•Co-author, California Supreme Court Gives California’s Unfair Competition Law More Coverage, Litigation Alert (02.11.2013)

Speaking Engagements

•Speaker, State of the Law - Procedural Update, 2013 Class Action Litigation & Management Conference, Bridgeport Continuing Education, San Francisco, CA (08.22.2013)
•Speaker, Standing, Damages & California’s Unfair Competition Law, Privacy Litigation & Management: Strategies for Protection & Litigation, Bridgeport Continuing Education, San Francisco, CA (12.06.2012)

Recognitions & Awards

Northern California Super Lawyers (2014 - 2015)
Northern California Super Lawyers: Rising Star (2009 - 2012)
•Featured in a front-page article of The Recorder in 2009 concerning a successful motion to deny class certification in a nationwide consumer products class action in federal court alleging false advertising and unfair competition ( 17200 and other state analogues)
•Benjamin Franklin Scholar, University of Pennsylvania
•Phi Beta Kappa

Reported CasesRepresentative Matters: Class Actions & Product Liability: Conceived, briefed, and argued winning pre-emptive motion to deny class certification in putative nationwide class action against one of the world's largest retailers for products labeled Made in USA but allegedly containing imported components. Claims were made under the false advertising and unfair competition laws of all 50 states (including section 17200 and the CLRA). The district court granted our motion denying class certification before any discovery occurred, and the Ninth Circuit rejected the plaintiff's request for interlocutory review under Rule 23.; Defeated class certification in federal court action in California alleging false and misleading marketing based on fraud, unfair competition ( 17200), and warranty theories. Action was pending less than nine months when the court rejected class certification.; Successfully defended a national consumer products manufacturer in a series of three coordinated unfair competition and false advertising class actions in California - In re Tobacco II - seeking billions of dollars and injunctive relief (based primarily on 17200). Secured effective victory in one case through class decertification and in the other two through successful summary judgment motions.; Represented top US title insurer in a putative class action in a coordinated federal court case alleging antitrust, unfair competition ( 17200), and unfair competition claims. Eliminated antitrust claims on motion to dismiss, and succeeded in compelling individual (non-class) arbitration on remaining claims based on recent Supreme Court precedent.; Defended a medical records imaging company in a putative class action in Florida alleging violation of Florida Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act based on alleged noncompliance with statute governing permissible copy charges.; Defending a national financial institution and its federal savings bank subsidiary in putative class action in federal court by borrowers whose vehicles were repossessed alleging violation of California's Rees-Levering Act (concerning required content of notices of repossession and deficiencies on auto loans) as a predicate for unfair competition ( 17200) claims.; Represented a major US sporting goods retailer in unfair competition ( 17200) and related claims in California concerning alleged pricing discrepancies.; Won on summary judgment in product liability and negligence action filed by Republic of Marshall Islands in that country against consumer products company.; Securities, Real Estate, & Fraud Litigation: Obtained dismissal with prejudice of all 13 claims, including fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and California Corporations Code violations, in a federal securities action against a prominent investment banker.; Defended a real estate advisor and property management company in a lawsuit by 20 property investors alleging fraud, negligence, California Corporations Code violations, UCL ( 17200), and other claims. Successfully eliminated all but contract claims and obtained early dismissal with prejudice of two defendants.; Defended a managing broker-dealer of real estate securities in connection with claims arising from sale of investor interests in a California commercial real estate project.; Represented an owner of landmark multifamily residential real estate property in California in an action involving claims of wrongful foreclosure, slander of title, breach of contract, and UCL ( 17200) violations.; Obtained a favorable jury verdict in a California federal action involving fraud, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO), and False Claims Act claims in a government-funded transportation construction project.; Won an appeal and obtained an award of attorneys' fees for appellate work in a real estate contract dispute.; Defended five defendants in a 10-count action brought by a former president, director, and shareholder of one of the corporate defendants. Most of the claims - including breach of fiduciary duty, RICO, conversion, employment discrimination, and unlawful termination - were dismissed on the pleadings.; Defended a prominent investment banker in disciplinary proceedings before the National Association of Securities Dealers (now the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) and the Securities and Exchange Commission.; IP, Technology-Related & Other Complex Litigation: Defended a software modification and customization firm in contract, fraud, and 17200 action involving the design and implementation of an enterprise resource planning software (ERP) system.; Defended a company providing customized radio frequency identification (RFID) asset tracking technology in an action involving trade secrets and technology issues.; Represented the owner of famous trademarks in kitchenware industry in parallel federal trademark infringement actions pending in California and New York (along with 17200 and other claims); we briefed and argued successful motion to stay California action.; Defended a software programming firm in contract disputes concerning a customized e-commerce website and client application.; Represented a website in a dispute pending simultaneously in federal and state courts over trademark and ownership rights in domain name and website assets.; Represented numerous clients in disputes over Internet domain names and related trademark issues including compelling transfer of infringing domain names.; Represented a variety of clients, including wine makers, a ski and snowshoe manufacturer, and a pharmaceuticals company, in trademark disputes including Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) proceedings and negotiation of co-existence agreements.; Defended a Germany-based software manufacturer against contract claims by a US-based distributor and prosecuted counter claims for trademark and copyright infringement in federal court.; Managed an action by a manufacturer of printed circuit boards against a non-US consumer involving compliance with specifications for plasma TV technology.; Successfully defended a consumer website company in actions alleging violation of California's Anti-Spam laws.; Advised a trademark owner in a dispute with a licensee over a breach of license agreement and infringement of marks and proposing a creative resolution.; Participated in a bench trial on advertising and a First Amendment case against the attorney general.; Obtained complete dismissal on pleadings in a federal employment discrimination, defamation, and negligence case.; Counseled and advised an Internet retailer concerning the effects of regulations in all US jurisdictions governing online tobacco sales.; Counseled an Internet client on trademark and privacy issues surrounding online promotions.; Won a favorable settlement for an Internet caching service client in an arbitration involving Lanham Act false advertising claims.; Insurance Litigation: Counsel and advise numerous insurance companies on coverage and defense matters, including serving as panel counsel for a leading technology insurer.; Defended insurance carriers against claims of bad faith, contribution, and indemnity seeking more than US$200 million involving complex allocation across decades of policies stemming from long-tail product liability claims.; Prosecuted and defended equitable contribution, indemnity, and subrogation claims on behalf of numerous insurers, including in direct action against insurer, multi-party construction defect cases, and disputes among primary and excess insurers in product liability actions.; Represented insurance carrier in action against broker for misappropriating premiums and failing to properly account for funds among insurers.
Profile Visibility
#299 in weekly profile views out of 22,059 lawyers in San Francisco, California
#31,533 in weekly profile views out of 1,727,249 total lawyers Overall

Office Information

Evan Nadel

44 Montgomery Street, 36th Floor
San FranciscoCA 94104


Professional Networking for Legal Professionals Only

Quickly and easily expand your professional
network - join the premier global network for legal professionals only. It's powered by the
Martindale-Hubbell database - over 1,000,000 lawyers strong.
Join Now