| Antitrust Law | Banking Law |
| Bankruptcy Law | Commercial Law |
| Construction Law | Corporate Law |
| Eminent Domain | Employment Benefits Law |
| Environmental Law | General Practice |
| Government Contracts | Health Care Law |
| Intellectual Property Law | Product Liability Law |
| Real Estate Law | Securities Law |
|
|
Learn More |
About this office:
Faegre Baker Daniels has been at the center of business in the Rocky Mountains for 25 years. With more than 120 lawyers practicing in our Denver and Boulder offices, we are one of the largest law firms in the region.
We have broad experience in the industries central to the Rocky Mountain region, including traditional manufacturing, agriculture, renewable energy, information technology, biotechnology and telecommunications.
Specific Practice & Industry Groups Details:
Statement of Practice Summary:
General Practice including Antitrust, Banking, Bankruptcy, Commercial, Construction, Corporate, E-Commerce, Eminent Domain, Employment, Environmental, Financial Institutions, Government Contracts, Intellectual Property, Real Estate, Hospital and Health Care, Litigation, Product Liability, Securities.
Documents by Lawyers at this office | |
Seventh Circuit Holds Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives Are Exempt Under FLSAEllen E. Boshkoff,Thomas W. Carroll,Daniel G. Prokott, May 11, 2012
On May 8, 2012, the Seventh Circuit became the latest U.S. Circuit Court to weigh in on the exempt status of pharmaceutical sales representatives under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co., a consolidated case considering appeals from divergent district...
Supreme Court Decides Kappos v. HyattNina Y. Wang,Marie E. Williams, April 23, 2012
On April 18, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Kappos v. Hyatt, No. 10-1219. The Court held that in a civil action brought pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 145, there are no limitations on a patent applicant's ability to introduce new evidence beyond those already present in the Federal Rules of Evidence...
Supreme Court Decides Mohamad v. Palestinian AuthorityJon Laramore,Marie E. Williams, April 23, 2012
On April 18, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority, No. 11-88. The Court held that the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 ("TVPA"), which creates a cause of action in United States courts for acts of torture committed under color of a foreign nation's law,...