Faith Isenhath is a member of the Labor and Employment Law Department. She represents employers in issues related to the workplace. Faith's practice covers all aspects of labor and employment law defense, and focuses on employment discrimination. Additionally, Faith counsels and advises employers regarding compliance with Title VII; the Americans with Disabilities Act; the Family and Medical Leave Act; the Fair Labor Standards Act; and a variety of other state and federal employment statutes and regulations.
Memberships & Affiliations
· Federal Bar Association
· Cincinnati Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section, Social Committee, Co-Chair
· Federal Lawyer Journal, Former Co-Author of Labor & Employment monthly column
· Ohio State Bar Association
· American Bar Association
· Marjorie P. Lee Retirement Center, Volunteer
· SPCA, Social Committee
Experience
Sheri Blaney v. Cengage Learning, Inc.
Cengage Learning, Inc.
Won summary judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for age discrimination and retaliation.
Serednyj v. Beverly Healthcare LLC
Beverly Healthcare LLC
Defended against claims for sex, disability, and retaliation under the Pregnancy discrimination Act, Title VII, and Americans with Disabilities Act
Stoll v. Crown Services Inc.
Crown Services Inc.
Defended against claims for FMLA retaliation and interference, pregnancy and sex discrimination.
Xi v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Procter & Gamble Co.
Defended against wrongful termination and whistleblower claims.
Thompson v. Environmental Risk Solutions, et al
Environmental Risk Solutions, et al
Defended against claims of breach of contract, promissory estoppel, violations under ERISA, constructive discharge, wrongful discharge, fraud, fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment, and negligent misrepresentation.
Mellon v. AseraCare
AseraCare
Defended against defamation and whistleblower claims.
Beverly Coda v. Thorntons, Inc.
Thorntons, Inc.
Won summary judgment in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas for promissory estoppel, breach of contract, and gender discrimination.
Baldwin v. General Electric Co.
General Electric Co.
Defended against claims of sexual harassment, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Downard v. The Labor Company, et al
The Labor Company, et al
Defended against claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and intentional tort.
Huber v. S&S Healthcare, et al
S&S Healthcare, et al
Defended against claims of ERISA violations, breach of contract, promissory estoppel, sex discrimination, good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.
Halma Acquisitions
Halma, P.L.C.
Our team worked to structure the asset purchase of Sensorex for $37.5 million and the stock purchase of Accutome for an initial payment of $20 million, handling everything from negotiating and drafting the documents to managing the legal due diligence for both transactions. We assisted Halma with the intellectual property, benefits and employment components of each deal and assisted with all details of closing.
Publications
June 2011, ABCs of Employment Law
March 2, 2011, Recent Supreme Court Case Allows Third Party Retaliation Claims
February 1, 2011, "Effective Negotiation Practices and Strategies," The Federal Lawyer - February 2011
January 1, 2011, "Supreme Court Employment Cases," The Federal Lawyer - January 2011
March 1, 2010, Social Networking in the Workplace
January 1, 2010, The Federal Lawyer (2010) - contributing articles authored by Mike Newman and Faith Isenhath
January 2010, Federal Law Regarding Transgender Employees and Gender Identity Claims in the Workplace: An Overview
May 4, 2009, Recent Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision on Association and Advocacy Claims
January 1, 2009, The Federal Lawyer (2009) - contributing articles authored by Mike Newman and Faith Isenhath
April 21, 2008, Paid Sick Days for Ohio: The Proposed Ohio Healthy Families Act
January 1, 2008, The Federal Lawyer (2008) - contributing articles authored by Mike Newman and Faith Isenhath
January 1, 2006, Survey: How Recent Kentucky Courts are Applying the Retaliation Claim in Employment Cases