Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C.

 – Firm Profile
 




Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. Law Firm Logo

Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. 

Size of Organization: 25
Web Site: http://www.finemanlawfirm.com

Telephone: 215-893-9300
Fax: 215-893-8719



Profile Visibility
#1,130 in weekly profile views out of 279,504 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm


Insurance Defense
 
               Learn More

 



Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C.: 14


Documents by Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. on Martindale.com

Subscribe to this feed

Court Finds That Violation of UIPA Can Not Be Basis for Bad Faith Claim; and Finds That Insured Could Not Meet Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard on Reasonableness Prong of Bad Faith Test (Western District)
July 22, 2014
In United States Fire Insurance Company v. Kelman Bottles, LLC, property damage occurred for the insured from an event concerning an industrial glass making furnace. The insured’s all risk carrier brought a declaratory judgment action against the insured. The insured also had a Boiler and...

No Separate Tort Cause of Action for Breach of Duty of Good Faith; Statutory Bad Faith Claim Pleaded Mere Possibility of Bad Faith, Not a Plausible Bad Faith Claim, and Was Dismissed With Leave to Amend (Western District)
July 22, 2014
In Plummer v. State Firm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, the insureds made a first party damage claim, involving storm damage to its roof. The insureds claimed that the insurer failed to pay anything toward the roof damage, while paying a claim for roof damage to their neighbor for damage to...

Insurer’s Motion to Dismiss Hospital’s Bad Faith Breach of Contract Claim Denied (New Jersey Federal Court)
July 17, 2014
In Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Roseland Ambulatory Surgery Ctr., the plaintiff/counterclaim-defendant insurer brought claims against defendant/counterclaim-plaintiff hospital for failure to require patients to pay certain out-of-pocket expenses. The insurer originally brought a claim alleging that...






 

Complete a Client Review


Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.
 
 

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.
 

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of martindale.com Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.