Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C.

 – Firm Profile

Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. Law Firm Logo

Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. 

Size of Organization: 25
Web Site:

Telephone: 215-893-9300
Fax: 215-893-8719

Profile Visibility
#5,293 in weekly profile views out of 279,115 total law firms Overall

Icon for Featured Peer Review Rated LawyerIcon for Featured Peer Review Rated Lawyer at this firm

Insurance Defense
               Learn More


Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
Peer Review Ratings

Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C.: 14

Documents by Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. on

Subscribe to this feed

Professional Insured Stated Bad Faith Cause Of Action Against E&O Carrier Where Its Alleged Conduct, Whether Legal Or Not, Involved Professional Services; And Exclusion, Even If Applicable, Did Not Cover All Claims In Underlying Action And Could Not Be A Basis To Deny Coverage For All Claims (Western District)
April 22, 2014
In Municipal Revenue Services v. Houston Casualty Company, plaintiffs were in the business of purchasing government tax liens. A law firm accused plaintiffs of scheming with other attorneys to improperly move those tax liens to others. The law firm sought equitable relief to enjoin those...

Court Closely Scrutinizes Plaintiff’s Expert and Gives Detailed Opinion on Limits to that Expert’s Testimony and Guidelines on How Expert Report Must Be Made and Presented to Survive a Motion to Strike that Testimony (Philadelphia Federal)
April 14, 2014
In Leporace v. N.Y. Life & Annuity Corp. the insurers filed a motion to exclude expert testimony, on plaintiff’s bad faith expert. The expert was previously by one of the defendants that handle claims for an insurer defendant. She affied that she has worked in the field of disability...

No Bad Faith Where Alleged Misrepresentations Occurred Prior to Policy’s Inception; Contractual Limitation on Stacking Permissible (Third Circuit)
April 14, 2014
In Grudkowski v. Foremost Ins. Co., the court addressed an appeal, with the class action appellee-insureds asserting that the insurance provided them should have been deemed illusory by the lower court. The Third Circuit affirmed, and denied the request to certify the issue to Pennsylvania’s...


Complete a Client Review

Have you recently worked with this firm? Share your experience as a Client of this firm and complete a Client Review to help others make an informed choice when hiring legal counsel.

Compare this Firm

Compare this firm to other firms in your Favorites.

Add to Favorites

As a registered user of Connected, you can add law firms to your list of Favorites. You can securely add comments and compare the law firms in your Favorites.