|Bankruptcy Law||Business Law|
|Commercial Litigation||Corporate Law|
|Energy Law||Environmental Law|
|General Practice||Government Contracts|
|Health Care Law||Intellectual Property Law|
|Mergers and Acquisitions||Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Unfair Competition|
|Real Estate Law||Securities Law|
|Sports and Entertainment Law||Tax Law|
|Trademark, Copyright, and Unfair Competition||White Collar Crime|
About this office:
Foley & Lardner LLP continually evolves to meet the changing legal needs of our clients. Our team-based approach, proprietary client service technology, and practice depth enhance client relationships while seeing clients through their most complex legal challenges. The BTI Consulting Group (Wellesley, Massachusetts) recently recognized Foley as one of the top four law firms shaping the U.S. legal market, while CIO magazine has named Foley to its CIO 100 list six times for our client-focused technology. Whether in the United States or around the world, count on Foley for high-caliber business and legal insight.
Statement of Practice Summary:
Automobile Law; Emerging Technologies; Energy; Entertainment Law; Media Law; Food Law; Golf; Resort; Health Care; Insurance; Life Sciences; Nanotechnology; Sports Law; Business Law; Corporate Law; Commercial Transactions; Business Counseling; Corporate Governance Services; Environmental Regulation; Estates; Trusts; Finance; Financial Institutions Law; Health Care Finance; Business Reorganization; International Business Law; Mergers And Acquisitions; Private Equity; Venture Capital; Public Finance Services; Real Estate; Tax Law; Employee Benefits; Individual Planning; Transactional; Securities; Business Transactions; Project; Infrastructure Finance; Asset Securitization; Interference; Financial Products; Variable Insurance; Technology Law; Risk Management; Captives; Public Agencies; Brownfields; Land Use; Entitlement; Airport Services; Agency; Distribution; Hedge Funds; Higher Education Law; Structured Finance; Tenant-In-Common; Directors; Officers; Taxation; Charitable Gifts; Private Foundations; Estate Planning; Water Issues; Wind Energy; Reinsurance Runoff; Surface Transport; Arbitrage Rebate Compliance; Intellectual Property; Biotechnology; Pharmaceutical; Chemical; Consumer Law; Industrial Products; Electronics; Ip Litigation; Trademarks; Copyrights; Advertising Law; Stem Cell Technologies; Genomics; Litigation; Antitrust; Appellate Practice; Bankruptcy; Business Reorganizations; Construction Law; Franchise Law; Energy Regulation; Family Law; General Commercial Litigation; Insurance Dispute Resolution; Labor And Employment; Product Liability; Securities Litigation; Enforcement; Regulation; Valuation; Fiduciary Litigation; White Collar Defense; Corporate Compliance; Mechanical; Electromechanical Technologies; Ip Due Diligence; Business Method Patents; Patent Prosecution; Copyright Enforcement; Health Law; Medical Devices; Nutraceuticals; Provider Operations; Academic Medical Centers; Reinsurance; Commutation; Health Care Compliance; Translational Research; Fda; Hipaa; Long Term Care; Medicare And Medicaid; Information Technology; Outsourcing; Data Security; Privacy Law; Telecommunications Law; Computers And Software Law; Multimedia Law; Government Procurement; Political Law; Public Affairs; Strategic Communications; Lobbying; Investor Relations; Appropriations; Government Relations; State Affairs; Biotech; Biomedical Start-Ups; Clinical Research; Commercial Development; Erisa; False Claims; Compliance Counseling; Financial Markets; Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures; Insolvency; Mixed Use; Retail Development; Physicians; Medical Groups; Residential Real Estate; Condominium Law; Resorts; Senior Living; Syndicated; Securities-Related Transactions; Trade Secret/Noncompete Litigation.
Documents by Lawyers at this office
Federal Circuit Jurisdiction Over Patent Contract Disputes
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff, October 15, 2014
In a precedential order issued in Jang v. Boston Scientific Corp., the Federal Circuit held that it has jurisdiction over the parties’ patent-related contract dispute under Gunn v. Minton even though the patents at issue have been invalidated. Despite having found Federal Circuit...
Federal Circuit Hears Arguments in Other Myriad Gene Patents Case
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff, October 13, 2014
On October 6, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in a case involving the claims of the Myriad gene patents that were not invalidated by the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision. The Federal Circuit is reviewing the district court’s denial of Myriad’s motion for a preliminary...
Federal Circuit Upholds Inequitable Conduct Post Therasense For Withheld Information
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff, October 7, 2014
In American Calcar, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s finding that three Calcar patents are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. Both courts reached this decision of inequitable conduct post Therasense despite the fact that the validity of...
Year Established: 1842
(See Foley & Lardner listings at Milwaukee and Madison, Wisconsin; Chicago, Illinois; Washington, D.C.; Jacksonville, Miami, Orlando, Tallahassee and Tampa, Florida; Los Angeles, Palo Alto, Sacramento, San Diego and San Francisco, California; New York, New York; Boston, Massachusetts; Tokyo, Japan and Brussels, Belgium for professional biographies information on attorneys resident in those offices)