Foley & Lardner LLP
Size of Organization: 966 Year Established: 1842 Web Site: http://www.foley.com
Telephone: 414-271-2400
Facsimile: 414-297-4900
| |
Profile Visibility 
#21 in weekly profile views out of 264,196 total law firms Overall |
|
|
|
|
| Bankruptcy Law | Business Law |
| Commercial Litigation | Corporate Law |
| Energy Law | Environmental Law |
| General Practice | Government Contracts |
| Health Care Law | Intellectual Property Law |
| Mergers and Acquisitions | Patent, Trademark, Copyright and Unfair Competition |
| Real Estate Law | Securities Law |
| Sports and Entertainment Law | Tax Law |
| Trademark, Copyright, and Unfair Competition | White Collar Crime |
|
|
Learn More |
Foley & Lardner LLP continually evolves to meet the changing legal needs of our clients. Our team-based approach, proprietary client service technology, and practice depth enhance client relationships while seeing clients through their most complex legal challenges. The BTI Consulting Group (Wellesley, Massachusetts) recently recognized Foley as one of the top four law firms shaping the U.S. legal market, while CIO magazine has named Foley to its CIO 100 list six times for our client-focused technology. Whether in the United States or around the world, count on Foley for high-caliber business and legal insight.
Martindale-Hubbell has augmented a firm's provided information with third-party sourced data to present a more comprehensive overview of the firm's expertise:
U.S. Federal Litigation Activity
Highest number of cases by Foley & Lardner LLP:
Toxic Torts (1661 cases in past two years)
Transactional Activity
Total number of Mergers & Aquisitions by Foley & Lardner LLP:
42 (in past two years)
U.S. Patent Activity
Total number of U.S. granted patents by Foley & Lardner LLP:
2858 (in past two years)
Peer Review Ratings
Total number of Peer Review Rated lawyers of Foley & Lardner LLP:
377
Client Review
Total number of Client Reviews for Foley & Lardner LLP:
8
Documents by Foley & Lardner LLP on Martindale.com
| |
Holding the USPTO Accountable For the RCE BacklogCourtenay C. Brinckerhoff, May 22, 2012
As I was cleaning up my office a few weeks ago, I came across a December 2009 article I wrote with my colleague Steve Reid for BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, entitled “New Patent Office Examination Procedures: Bane or Boon?” The article discusses the then-new...
Medical Device Patents: To Reexamine or Not to ReexamineRuben J. Rodrigues, May 22, 2012
Reexamination requests are generally on the rise at the USPTO, and nowhere is the increase more evident than in the important field of medical devices. Determining whether to invest resources into a patent reexamination proceeding can be very complicated: What is your company’s position in...
Top 10 Appearances for Foley & Lardner LLP on Martindale.com