martindale.com
Legal Library
|
Foley & Lardner LLP Document Search Results (470) Show: results per page Sort by:  | CMS And OIG Issue Proposed Rules Modifying the Stark Exception and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor fFor Donation of EHR
C. Frederick Geilfuss, Shilpa S. Patel, Richard K. Rifenbark, Donald H. Romano; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 18, 2013, previously published on April 17, 2013 On April 10, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) each published proposed rules in the Federal Register (Proposed Rules) designed to modify requirements of the Stark Law exception...
| | Personalized Medicine and the Gene Patenting Debate
Antoinette F. Konski; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 18, 2013, previously published on April 15, 2013 The transcript for today’s Supreme Court oral argument in The Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. No. 12-398 (2013) has been released, and the importance of the gene patenting debate to personalized medicine was discussed. The Court was well briefed on the issues and...
| | "Human Genes" and Patents
Antoinette F. Konski; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 16, 2013, previously published on April 15, 2013 At 10:00 A.M. on April 15th, the U.S. Supreme Court will entertain oral arguments in the dispute now known as the human “gene patenting” case. The Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., No. 12-398 (2013) is likely the highest profile patent dispute before the...
| | Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in "ACLU/Myriad" Gene Patenting Case
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 16, 2013, previously published on April 15, 2013 On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in one of the most controversial and publicized biotech patent cases, the “ACLU/Myriad” gene patenting case (formally, The Association For Molecular Pathology. et al. v. USPTO et al.). While it is nearly impossible to predict the...
| | Driverless Car Technology - Legislation Slow to Keep Pace
Ryan S. Bewersdorf; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 16, 2013, previously published on April 15, 2013 Major technology companies have already logged 300,000 miles on U.S. roads with self driving cars. Driverless (or automated or autonomous) vehicle technology is rapidly advancing and states are starting to enact legislation. Driverless car technology has the ability to attract billions in research...
| | Elmbrook School District v. Doe: Will the U.S. Supreme Court Rule on the Constitutionality of Holding Public High School Graduations in Elmbrook Church?
Foley Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 15, 2013, previously published on April 11, 2013 During its conference this Friday, April 12, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to consider Elmbrook School District’s petition for a writ of certiorari seeking reversal of a decision issued last summer by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Doe v. Elmbrook School...
| | Health Care Providers Beware - You May Be a Governmental Contractor
Daniel A. Kaplan, Mark J. Neuberger; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 15, 2013, previously published on April 11, 2013 Executive Order 11246 (Order) was first issued in September 1965 by President Johnson. Its purpose was to prohibit race, religion, color, and national origin discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors and require them to engage in “affirmative action” to employ and advance...
| | Hanging Out to Air: CFPB Expands Consumer Complaint Database
Timothy S. Crisp; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 15, 2013, previously published on April 10, 2013 The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) recently expanded its existing Consumer Complaint Database to cover additional consumer financial products and services.
| | Federal Circuit Finds Patent Marking is Circumstantial Evidence of Infringement
Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 15, 2013, previously published on April 11, 2013 In Frolow v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., the Federal Circuit refused to adopt the doctrine of marking estoppel, but held that evidence that Wilson had marked some accused tennis racket models constituted evidence of infringement sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact and prevent...
| | Evolving Judicial Attitudes Towards Predictive Coding Suggest It May Soon Be Time to Retire the Defensibility Question
Akiva M. Cohen; Foley & Lardner LLP;
Legal Alert/Article April 15, 2013, previously published on April 10, 2013 As predictive coding technology began garnering attention, one of the earliest and most common questions among attorneys paying attention to e-Discovery issues - probably the second most common question, right after “does it work” - was whether judges would accept it if opposing counsel...
|
|