Gene Livingston founded Livingston & Mattesich in 1982 to represent clients in their interactions with the State of California. Gene was among the first attorneys in Sacramento to provide experienced and effective advocacy in all forums of public decision-making: the Legislature, regulatory agencies, and the courts. In February 1998, California Lawyer magazine named Gene one of the ten most powerful lawyer-lobbyists in Sacramento and noted, Livingston was appointed by the Governor as the first director of California's Office of Administrative Law. The Office was created in 1980 to review all state agency regulations, to reduce their number and improve their quality. The experience gave Livingston an insider's view of every state agency. Gene has effectively combined his insider's knowledge of state government, litigation experience, knowledge of the Legislature, state agencies, and the courts to the full advantage of his clients. His philosophy of tailoring services to the exact needs of each client remains a central theme.
Today, Gene is recognized as a go-to-person to address relationships and legislation in the California Legislature, to affect proposed regulations, and to challenge agency actions in court. In addition to being an authority on the rule-making process, he is front and center, representing individual clients and business associations, on the implementation of California's green chemistry law, also known as the safer consumer products regulation, and continues to be heavily involved in Proposition 65, a practice he began in 1986, the year the initiative passed.
Further, Gene advises and represents his business and trade association clients on legislation affecting business, other environmental regulatory issues at Cal-EPA, such as VOCs in consumer products, insurance legislation and regulations, and public contracts.
While Gene works hard to achieve public policy results favorable to his clients, litigation is necessary at times. He handles court challenges to legislation on constitutional grounds, to regulations lacking legal authority, to administrative actions without a scientific, factual or legal basis, and to public contracts for procedural violations. His reputation and experience as a litigator furthers his credibility as a public policy advocate.
Prior to founding the firm, Gene held a number of governmental and academic appointments. He served in two gubernatorial-appointed and state senate-confirmed positions in California state government. As the first director of the California Office of Administrative Law from 1980 to 1982, he organized the office charged with reviewing all state agency regulations. Under Gene's leadership, new regulations adopted by the 124 state agencies were cut by 50%, over 11,000 pages of existing regulations were evaluated with 24% targeted for elimination, and another 33% changed to conform to the law. The Legislature and the business community hailed the Office of Administrative Law as a unique success in state government.
For five years before organizing the Office of Administrative Law, Gene served as Chief Deputy Director and then acting Director of the California Employment Development Department, an agency with 15,000 employees and a budget of $2.5 billion. He operated several major programs, including the collection of unemployment, disability insurance and state income taxes and the payment of unemployment and disability insurance benefits.
Areas of Concentration
•Advocacy before the California Legislature, state agencies and the courts
•Business regulation and compliance
•Proposition 65 compliance and litigation
Awards & Recognition
•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Administrative / Regulatory Law; Environmental Law; Government Relations Practice; Litigation - Environmental, 2009-2016
•Team Member, U.S. News - Best Lawyers, Best Law Firms Edition, Law Firm of the Year, Environmental Law, 2016
•Listed, Top Lawyer, Sacramento magazine, 2015
•Listed, Super Lawyers magazine, Northern California Super Lawyers, 2004, 2006, 2013-2015
•Team Member, a U.S. News - Best Lawyers Government Relations Law Firm of the Year, 2014
•Ranked, Tier 1 - Government Relations, Sacramento Metropolitan Area
•Rated, AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5
AV, BV, AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies.
Associated News & Events
11.03.15 Greenberg Traurig Named 'Law Firm of the Year' for Environmental Law
08.19.15 26 Greenberg Traurig California Attorneys Recognized in 2016 Best Lawyers in America
07.09.15 16 Greenberg Traurig Attorneys Included in 2015 Edition of Northern California Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
11.14.14 Greenberg Traurig's Environmental Practice Receives Top Tier Rankings in U.S. News - Best Lawyers 2015 'Best Law Firms' List
10.23.14 Honorable Senate President pro Tempore, Darrell Steinberg to Join Greenberg Traurig
08.27.14 23 Greenberg Traurig California Attorneys Recognized in the 2015 Best Lawyers in America
08.25.14 17 Greenberg Traurig Environmental Attorneys Listed In Best Lawyers 2015
07.08.14 15 Greenberg Traurig Attorneys Included in 2014 Edition of Northern California Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
08.21.13 24 Greenberg Traurig California Attorneys Recognized in 2014 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
07.30.13 Ten Greenberg Traurig Attorneys Included in 2013 Edition of Northern California Super Lawyers & Rising Stars
09.07.12 Green Chemistry regulations embrace politics, not science
07.09.10 California's Unprecedented Green Chemistry Law Advances
03.29.10 Proposition 65 on Steroids
12.16.05 State Law As Health Hazard: How Prop 65 Undermines National Food Labeling
07.26.11 OEHHA Identifies 39 New Chemicals for Evaluation Under Proposition 65
11.02.09 Will California Ban Consumer Products?
07.21.09 Sacramento Newsletter
04.06.09 Sacramento Quarterly Newsletter
Articles, Publications, & Lectures
•Co-Author, California Update: Prop 65 Status, Prop 65 Reform, HCS Differences, Opposition to SB 193, and Ethylbenzene PEL, Styrene Industry News, May 2013
•Author, Council Ignores Problems with Proposed Green Chemistry Regulations, Daily Journal, March 2013
•Quoted, Only Proven Carcinogens Will Make Prop 65 List: Calif. Court, Law360, November 1, 2012
•Author, State 'Green Chemistry' Regulations Stifle Innovation, Daily Journal, September 14, 2012
•Author, Green Chemistry Regulations Embrace Politics, Not Science, Daily Journal, September 7, 2012
•Author, A Matter of Consensus: Development of Green Chemistry Law Regulation, Daily Journal, July 28, 2011
•Author, OEHHA Identifies 39 New Chemicals for Evaluation Under Proposition 65, GT Alert, July 2011
•Author, Green Chemistry Rulemaking Renewed, Greenberg Traurig's E2 Law Blog , July 2011
•Author, California's Unprecedented Green Chemistry Law Advances, Washington Legal Foundation: Legal Opinion Letter, Vol. 19 No.14, July 9, 2010
•Author, Proposition 65 on Steroids, San Francisco Daily Journal, March 29, 2010
•Author, Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation Fails Passage, GT Sacramento Newsletter, July 2009
•Author, Implementation of Green Chemistry is Underway, GT Sacramento Newsletter, March 2009
Gene is a frequent speaker at seminars and conferences on Proposition 65, the regulatory process, and effective legislative advocacy. He is also a sponsor of the Proposition 65 Clearinghouse Annual Conference.
•Speaker, California State Senate Distinguished Speaker Forum, Sacramento, CA, April 1, 2013