Practice Areas & Industries: Goldberg Segalla LLP

 





Group Profile Lawyers in this Group Offices Locations for this Group
 

Practice/Industry Group Overview

Goldberg Segalla’s Toxic Torts Practice Group has a long history of aggressively defending the interests of high-profile clients and trying cases to verdict. Market-leading companies from a vast array of industries trust Goldberg Segalla to handle their toxic tort litigation and to provide preventative counsel to help minimize the risk of a lawsuit. Our clients include: 

  • Equipment manufacturers, including manufacturers of pumps, valves, brakes, boilers, electrical products, and aviation-related products
  • Building product manufacturers and sellers, including manufacturers and distributors of insulation, joint compound, gaskets, and furnace cement
  • Residential product manufacturers, including manufacturers of washing machines and dryers, residential irons, and hair dryers and curlers
  • Premises owners, including residential, commercial, and industrial
  • Contractors, including commercial, industrial, and residential
  • Transportation providers, including trucking companies and railroads

Our experience spans the full range of toxic torts, including:

  • Asbestos litigation — Over the last 30 years, our trial lawyers have collectively litigated thousands of asbestos cases across the country and served as national, trial, and local counsel. Goldberg Segalla has significant experience involving New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL), as well as the defense of cases in New Jersey and Philadelphia, among other markets.
  • Chemical exposure claims — Our cases involve a wide array of chemicals and injuries, including allegations of emotional distress, medical monitoring, fear of cancer, multiple chemical sensitivity, and increased risk of injury.
  • Environmental contamination claims — We have litigated both personal and property injury claims, including those resulting from underground storage tank leaks and chemical releases.
  • Indoor air quality — Our team is well versed in defending personal injury claims allegedly caused by adverse indoor air quality, along with the particular challenges facing defendants, insurers, and experts.
  • Lead paint claims — We have effected successful dispositions of numerous significant lead-poisoning cases and developed strong working relationships with the foremost experts in lead-based-paint poisoning.
  • Mold claims — We have extensive experience in mold-related tort and property claims, successfully resolving the vast majority prior to trial either through settlement or dismissal thanks, in part, to our extensive network of expert witnesses.

Several members of our team have background experience in environmental science, consulting, wastewater treatment, and other disciplines, providing increased efficiency and greater understanding of the technical and scientific challenges facing our clients.

Our Approach

We believe that each toxic tort case must be thoroughly prepared as if it were going to trial — or, in cases where there is no liability, we aggressively pursue an early dismissal. Our team develops a comprehensive working knowledge of each client with a focus on developing defenses that are unique to the client or particular facts of a case. If there is a medical defense, we take the lead and work with our extensive network of experts to develop it. If there is a question regarding credibility of product identification, we investigate the sites and locate co-workers to challenge a plaintiff’s claim. We aggressively develop proof regarding alternative exposure.

In short, we know what needs to be done to place our clients in the best possible position to proceed to trial and verdict, if necessary. Our proactive approach, coupled with our relationships with the prominent plaintiffs’ firms, has led to consistently successful results in even the most complex, high-exposure cases.


 
 
Articles Authored by Lawyers at this office:

NYCAL Court Consolidates Nine Cases Into Three Groups Based on Malcolm Factors and Common Questions of Law and Fact
Jason A. Botticelli,Joseph J. Welter, May 15, 2015
In this NYCAL case, the plaintiff brought a motion to consolidate nine asbestos actions for joint trial, claiming that there are common questions of law and fact. The court relied on the factors set forth in Malcolm v. National Gypsum Co., 995 F.2d 346, 350-351 (2d Cir. 1993): common worksite;...

Pump Manufacturer’s Reliance on Affidavit of Technical Consultant Fails to Create a Prima Facie Entitlement to Summary Judgment
Jason A. Botticelli,Joseph J. Welter, May 15, 2015
In this NYCAL case, the plaintiff, Alan Watts, claimed his development of mesothelioma was a result of his service in the Navy as a shipfitter working on a wide range of equipment on various ships between 1944 and 1966. The defendant, pump manufacturer Superior Ledgerwood Mundy Corp. (SLM), as...

Question of Fact Found Regarding if Asbestos Insulation Supplied by Company Was for Improvement of Real Property as Required Under Wisconsin Statute of Repose
Jason A. Botticelli,Joseph J. Welter, May 15, 2015
In this case, the plaintiff, Robin Sorenson, filed strict product liability and negligence claims on behalf of herself and the estate of the decedent who worked as an insulator from 1955 to 1997 and died of lung cancer in 2009. One of the defendants, Building Services Industrial Sales, Inc. (BSIS),...

Supreme Court Upholds Take-Nothing Judgment for Property Owner Based on Texas Statute Relating to Outside Contractors
Jason A. Botticelli,Joseph J. Welter, May 15, 2015
In this case, it is claimed the plaintiffs’ decedent, Robert Henderson, worked as an insulator for insulation contractor Win-Way Industries and claimed asbestos exposure from both his work and the work of Dow Chemical Company employees installing asbestos insulation at the Dow Freeport Texas...