Home > Goldberg Segalla LLP > Legal Library

Legal Articles: Goldberg Segalla LLP

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 59


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next  
Show: results per page
Sort by:

HTMLFifth Circuit: Claimant Must Wait for Actual Claim Denial to File Suit
Fallyn B. Cavalieri, Sarah J. Delaney; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 26, 2014, previously published on November 17, 2014
In an unpublished opinion, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a class action suit that alleged the claim administrator, wrongfully denied payment of medical claims “immediately,” instead of waiting for the participant to fail to provide requested information. In this case, the...

 

HTMLOregon Federal District Court Rejects Coverage for Trademark Infringement Under Coverage B
Jonathan L. Schwartz, Colin B. Willmott; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 26, 2014, previously published on November 18, 2014
In Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co, v. Willowood USA, LLC, et al., Civ. No. 6:13-cv-01923-MC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153363 (D. Or. Oct. 27, 2014), the district court of Oregon granted summary judgment in favor of Crum & Specialty Insurance Company, Allied World Assurance Company, and...

 

HTMLNew Jersey Federal District Court Sheds Light on “Use of Motor Vehicle” Standard in New Jersey Omnibus Statute
Davis J. Kim, Jonathan Schapp; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 26, 2014, previously published on November 25, 2014
In Carolina Casualty Insurance Co. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co., Civ. No. 09-4871, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150002 (Oct. 22, 2014), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey interpreted the “use of a motor vehicle” standard under New Jersey’s omnibus motor...

 

HTMLDrafting History or Purpose Does Not Undermine Plain Language: Illinois Federal Court Enforces Insured-Versus-Insured Exclusion
Kevin P. Lolli, Jonathan L. Schwartz; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 26, 2014, previously published on November 24, 2014
In Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Bernhardt, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152416 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 28, 2014), the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judgment in favor of Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (Travelers), finding it had no duty to defend or indemnify...

 

HTMLWhat’s in Your Breakfast Sanwich? The Eighth Circuit Weighs in on Accidental Product Contamination Policies and Voluntary Product Recalls
Michael S. Saltzman, Joel J. Terragnoli; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 26, 2014, previously published on November 26, 2014
In Hot Stuff Foods, LLC v. Houston Casualty Co., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21727 (8th Cir. Nov. 17, 2014), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court decision holding that a food company’s voluntary recall was covered under an ‘accidental product...

 

HTMLUpcoming Supreme Court Decision Could Change the EEOC Litigation Landscape for Employers
Caroline J. Berdzik, Jennifer M. Mannion; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
November 12, 2014, previously published on October 31, 2014
A decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on whether and to what extent a court may enforce the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) mandatory duty to conciliate discrimination claims before filing suit could significantly change the landscape of EEOC litigation for employers. The...

 

HTMLEmployer Dress Code Policies Under the Microscope as Supreme Court Reviews Abercrombie & Fitch Case
Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
October 28, 2014, previously published on October 17, 2014
A suit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against national clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., demonstrates why employers should carefully review any dress code policies with counsel, particularly as they may conflict with attire worn for religious...

 

HTMLEmployers Must Prepare for Scrutiny as Federal and State Labor Departments Join Together to Fight Employee Misclassification
Caroline J. Berdzik, David E. Leach; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
October 17, 2014, previously published on October 10, 2014
Employers across the country continue to misclassify workers as independent contractors rather than as employees, and as we recently saw in Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., such actions can result in litigation and federal and state scrutiny.

 

HTMLNinth Circuit Ruling on Misclassification of Independent Contractors Has Major Ramifications for Employers
Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 30, 2014, previously published on September 25, 2014
In Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16585 (9th Cir. Aug. 27, 2014), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that former Federal Express drivers were employees rather than independent contractors pursuant to California’s right-to-control test. This important...

 

HTMLFifth Circuit Religious Discrimination Determination Requires Employers to Gauge Sincerity of an Employee’s Religious Beliefs
Caroline J. Berdzik, Richard A. Braden; Goldberg Segalla LLP;
Legal Alert/Article
September 23, 2014, previously published on September 16, 2014
Most employers recognize that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) prohibits religious discrimination in the workplace and requires private employers to reasonably accommodate an applicant’s or employee’s religious practices and beliefs, subject to limited exceptions....

 


View Page: Prev  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next