Home > Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C. > Legal Library

Legal Articles: Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.

 







Document(s) published by this organization: 4


Sort by:

HTMLDirectional Signs Protected by the First Amendment
Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
August 6, 2015
Temporary directional signs are protected by the First Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled. The Town of Gilbert, Arizona had an ordinance restricting the usage of outdoor signs, including temporary directional signs. The Town cited preservation of aesthetic appeal and roadway safety as...

 

HTMLGallagher v. Tucson Unified School District
Robert D. Haws, Shelby M. Lile, Jennifer N. MacLennan, Susan Plimpton Segal; Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2015, previously published on May 12, 2015
Under A.R.S. § 12-820.05(B), a public entity cannot be held liable for injuries arising from a felony committed by an employee. This immunity, however, disappears if the entity knew of the employee's propensity for that action. How far does this exception go? What if the public entity should...

 

HTMLThe "Abercrombie Hijab" Case: Motive is Dispositive Factor in Determining Whether Religious Discrimination Occurred
Tom Chauncey, Robert D. Haws, James W. Kaucher, Jennifer N. MacLennan, Susan Plimpton Segal; Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
June 26, 2015, previously published on June 26, 2015
In 2008, Samantha Elauf applied for a job at Abercrombie & Fitch, a retail clothing store known for a distinctive style of clothing. A practicing Muslim, Ms. Elauf wore a headscarf to the interview. The store had a "look policy," which prohibited employees from wearing headgear of any...

 

HTMLAnti-Deficiency Protection For Vacant Lots? Not What The Arizona Supreme Court Intended
Kent E. Cammack, Christopher M. McNichol; Gust Rosenfeld P.L.C.;
Legal Alert/Article
April 15, 2015, previously published on January 28, 2015
On January 23, 2015, the Arizona Supreme Court held that Arizona's anti-deficiency statute protects only a completed residence. In so doing, it clarified a prior appellate court decision extending the statute's protections to borrowers who intend to turn vacant land into a future residence, but do...