- Water Law
- Water Rights
- Irrigation Law
- Environmental Permitting
- Wetlands Regulation
- Drainage Law
- Real Estate Contracts
- Real Estate Development
- Land Use
- Water Districts
Iowa State University, B.S.E.E., 1970; University of Denver, M.B.A., 1974
University of Colorado at Boulder, J.D., 1977
1977, Colorado and U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
Denver, Colorado (Member, Professionalism Committee, Chairman, Convention Committee, 1991-1992; Member, Environmental, Water, Real Estate, Corporate and Mineral Law Sections), Douglas County and American (Member, Sections on: Environment; Resources and Energy Law Litigation; Real Property; Trust and Estate Law) Bar Associations.
Ottumwa, Iowa, March 30, 1947
Order of the Coif; Beta Gamma Sigma; Phi Eta Sigma. Member, University of Colorado Law Review, 1975-1976. Rothgerber Appellate Moot Court Finalist. Recipient: Folsom Award; United States Department of the Army Commander's Award for Public Service. Co-Author: "The Anti-Speculation Doctrine Extended to Change of Water Rights Cases: A New Dilemma for Water Rights Owners" University of Denver Water Law Review, Volume 9, Issue 2, Spring 2006; "Water Law," Annual Survey of Colorado Law, 1985-1994. Member, Board of Editors, Annual Survey of Colorado Law, 1995-1999.
Centennial Water & Sanitation District v. City and County of Broomfield, Case No. 2009SA213 (2011); City & County of Broomfield v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co., 239 P.3d 1270 (Colo. 2010); City and County of Broomfield v. Farmers Reservoir and Irr. Co., 235 P.3d 296 (Colo. 2010); City of Black Hawk v. City of Central, 97 P.3d 951 (Colo. 2004); Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Co. v. Consolidated Mutual Water Co., 33 P.3d 799 (Colo. 2001); Water Supply and Storage Co. v. Curtis, 733 P.2d 680 (Colo. 1987); Page v. Clark, 592 P.2d 792 (Colo. 1979).
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.
Documents by this lawyer on Martindale.com