Home > Lawyer Profile
Home > Lawyer Profile
No photo Available

Henry Evans Howell, III

One E. Plume St.
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
Peer Rating
3.8 of 5.0
Client Rating
N/R
BV Rated
Experience & Credentials
Practice Areas
Eminent Domain; Inverse Condemnation; Property Rights Litigation
University
University of Virginia, B.A., 1977
Law School
University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1982
Admitted
1982, Virginia and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia; 1983, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit; 2005, U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia
ISLN
913441228
Peer Reviews (13)
BV Rated
3.8/5.0
Peer Rating
 
High Ethical Standard
Condemnation, Civil Litigation, Eminent Domain and Litigation
Areas of Practice
Legal Knowledge
3.9/5
Analytical Capabilities
3.8/5
Judgment
3.7/5
Communication Ability
3.8/5
Legal Experience
4.0/5
Peer Reviews (13)
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
highly regarded in his field
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
great guy, great lawyer. he actually beat me in a case that went to the va supreme court some years ago, but i don't hold a grudge! he is a gent.
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
5.0/5.0 Posted by a Of Counsel on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
one of the most ethical practioners i know. excellent attorney. i have had many cases with him and i am always impressed by his knowledge of the law
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
5/5
4.8/5.0 Posted by a Member on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
5/5
Analytical Capabilities
5/5
Judgment
5/5
Communication Ability
5/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Unknown on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
4.0/5.0 Posted by a Unknown on 04/01/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.8/5.0 Posted by a Member on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.8/5.0 Posted by a Partner on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
i have known him since childhood and have the highest regard for him.
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
4/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
3/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.8/5.0 Posted by a Unknown on 04/01/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
4/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
4/5
Communication Ability
4/5
Legal Experience
4/5
3.0/5.0 Posted by a Unknown on 04/01/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
3/5
Legal Experience
3/5
3.0/5.0 Posted by a Unknown on 04/01/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
2/5
Judgment
3/5
Communication Ability
3/5
Legal Experience
4/5
2.4/5.0 Posted by a Member on 09/10/09
Endorsed for Ethical Standing
Legal Knowledge
3/5
Analytical Capabilities
3/5
Judgment
2/5
Communication Ability
1/5
Legal Experience
3/5
2.2/5.0 Posted by a Unknown on 05/18/12
Legal Knowledge
2/5
Analytical Capabilities
2/5
Judgment
1/5
Communication Ability
3/5
Legal Experience
3/5
*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed
Disclaimer: No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. The testimonial or endorsement does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Any result that the endorsed lawyer or law firm may achieve on behalf of one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate that similar results can be obtained for other clients. Past success cannot be an assurance of future success because each case must be decided on its own merits. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Martindale-Hubbell® does not undertake to develop a Client Review Rating or Peer Review Rating for all firms and/or lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed as unfavorable. Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for and will not be liable for the content and accuracy of the individual Reviews and the aggregated Reviews.